Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#181
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
You pass your traffic through their proxy. They could be doing things like watching the browser's signature to see whether or not you're using the built-in browser, vs. a desktop browser. I mean, if you've got Safari or Internet Explorer signature tags in your traffic, that's pretty clearly not your N900 :-)
Err...

1) You can change useragents on both the tablets and computer
2) You can run an alternative operating system on the tablets (e.g. debian that has its own browsers.
3) Other browsers (e.g. fennec).

They can speculate but in the end since the n900 and the previous tablets are more computer than smartphone there's no reliable way to differentiate them.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#182
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
I think this is a bit askew. Here is the actual TOS language:

16. * Misuse of Service or Device
Read further:

29. Additional Terms for Data Plans and Features

The following terms apply to your data plan or feature (“Data Plan”). To the extent any term in your Data Plan expressly conflicts with the general Terms and Conditions, which also apply to your service, the term in your Data Plan will govern. Please read your Data Plan carefully.

1. Permissible and Prohibited Uses

Your Data Plan is intended for Web browsing, messaging, and similar activities on your device and not on any other equipment. Unless explicitly permitted by your Data Plan, other uses, including for example, tethering your device to a personal computer or other hardware, are not permitted.

Examples of prohibited uses include but are not limited to: (...) (b) as a substitute or backup for private lines or dedicated data connections;
Tethering is explicitly forbidden.
__________________
My Personal Blog

Last edited by johnkzin; 2009-11-07 at 21:34.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#183
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
Err...

1) You can change useragents on both the tablets and computer
2) You can run an alternative operating system on the tablets (e.g. debian that has its own browsers.
3) Other browsers (e.g. fennec).

They can speculate but in the end since the n900 and the previous tablets are more computer than smartphone there's no reliable way to differentiate them.
Whether or not you can obscure it is not the point. The point is: you're in violation of your TOS if you do it. For those of us who like to be either safe, honest, or good customers (or a combination of those), that means it's off limits.

There's all kinds of things I CAN do. That doesn't make it a good idea to actually do them.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#184
My point is that there's no way for them to differentiate the traffic. Not even by pattern of usage. Not like that matters though since the n900 is pretty much a computer anyway (you can do almost everything that is bandwith hungry on the computer on the n900 anyway).
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#185
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
My point is that there's no way for them to differentiate the traffic. Not even by pattern of usage.
There's no way for them to reliably differentiate the traffic. If you're intentionally being dishonest to avoid their ability to track you. There certainly are ways for them to differentiate the traffic of devices that aren't attempting to avoid their detection. Whether or not they detect it is beside the point. The point is: by doing it, you're violating the TOS. You're breaching a contract YOU signed. Those of us who are honest people consider that to be important, in and of itself.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#186
I'm afraid your missing the point. My point is that the n900 is so close to a computer that any user that uses the n900 like they do their computer can't be differentiated from a user that tethers their device. That is unless they have a dumb phone or an Android smartphone that doesn't have the capability that Maemo 5 and the n900 have.

I'm not saying anything regarding the TOS, or whether it's right or wrong.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...

Last edited by Laughing Man; 2009-11-07 at 22:19.
 
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#187
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Read further:



Tethering is explicitly forbidden.
Except if the data plan permits it.

Aren't the new Even More plans explicitly equipment agnostic?
__________________
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#188
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
My point is that the n900 is so close to a computer that any user that uses the n900 like they do their computer can't be differentiated from a user that tethers their device.
Which is irrelevant.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#189
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
Except if the data plan permits it.

Aren't the new Even More plans explicitly equipment agnostic?
They're equipment agnostic in as much as "you don't have to have a data plan on smartphones, if you don't want one". But the plans themselves, as far as I know, still don't mention being approved for tethering.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#190
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Which is irrelevant.
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Sure, they have to catch you at it ... and no word right now that they're looking for it*. But, if it comes up (or if you press them on some service issue and they'd rather not follow through on it), they can say "you violated the TOS, we're cutting you loose".

(* and they probably only care in their 3G areas)

That's why it's relevant. Because if they can't differentiate who's tethering with the n900 (because like I pointed out, the other phones can't do what the n900 can do) and who is simply using the n900 heavily, well I doubt they're going risk pissing people off. Especially since then they're breaking the contract.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32.