Nathraiben
|
2010-07-02
, 19:37
|
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 408 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Austria
|
#181
|
|
2010-07-02
, 19:43
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#182
|
|
2010-07-02
, 19:53
|
Posts: 275 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#183
|
Yes, by using the Settings applet on an N900 itself or via the web.
|
2010-07-02
, 20:12
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#184
|
It's a large part of it, sure, but it's definitely not the only part, and the world isn't as black and white as you seem to think it is.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-02
, 20:22
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#185
|
Could you please explain to me where to find this applet in the n900? I am not able to find it, unless you mean the My Nokia icon in the settings.
But if I click on it there are 2 options: subscribe and delete (I am translating from my language). No unsubscribe option is present.
I am afraid that clicking on delete it would erase my nokia account, while I just want that my data could not be communicated to other companies but keeping Nokia account.
The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-02
, 20:59
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#186
|
|
2010-07-02
, 21:03
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#187
|
|
2010-07-02
, 21:04
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#188
|
There would be no need to store the phone number in plain text on the public server just to send text messages. They could at least store them on a server not connected to the net for that...
|
2010-07-02
, 21:04
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#189
|
|
2010-07-02
, 21:19
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#190
|
It's a large part of it, sure, but it's definitely not the only part, and the world isn't as black and white as you seem to think it is.
Open core is a game on rather than a valid expression of software freedom, because it does not cultivate software freedom for the software user. In an open core business, there is a core package which is open source and which delivers basic functions. That package can be used freely under the terms of an open source licence, and there's no issue involved at this point - as Lampitt asserts,"the customers enjoy, in a way, guarantee of liberty from the vendor; if things go sideways for the vendor, there is a sort of a "guaranteed escrow" of the source code."But to use the package effectively in production, a business probably won't find the functions of the core package sufficient, even in the (usual) case of the core package being highly capable. They will find the core package largely ineffective without certain "extras", and these are only available in the "Enterprise Version" of the package - which is not open source.
To use those features, you are forced to be a customer only of the sponsoring company. There's no alternative, no way to do it yourself if the value delivered doesn't justify the expense involved or if you are time-rich and cash-poor. Worse, using the package locks you in to the supplier. If they prove a bad choice as a supplier, or if your business needs change, you have no real choice beyond "take it or leave it". In many cases, ending your subscription with the supplier will mean losing your rights to use the Enterprise Version all together.