Andyschism
|
2009-01-15
, 15:41
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Maryland
|
#11
|
|
2009-01-24
, 20:29
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Eastern U.S.A.
|
#12
|
|
2009-01-26
, 01:51
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#13
|
|
2009-01-28
, 18:05
|
|
Posts: 211 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Washington, DC
|
#14
|
|
2009-01-28
, 18:12
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#15
|
|
2009-01-28
, 18:17
|
|
Posts: 211 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Washington, DC
|
#16
|
10 mbps is great. I am guessing the speed disparity between the devices is due to the external antenna??
|
2009-01-28
, 18:24
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#17
|
Possibly... I've been wondering the same. Are there different WiMAX chipsets and limitations, or does the integrated antenna of the N810WE vs the positionable external antenna of the XOHM adapter on the U810 make that big a difference?
Not being an RF engineer and still a WiMAX n00b, I'm left scratching my head...
The Following User Says Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-01-28
, 18:50
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#18
|
The Following User Says Thank You to XTC For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-02-01
, 16:40
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#19
|
|
2009-02-10
, 10:12
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#20
|