Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 2 days, 20 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to telnet For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-08
, 18:53
|
|
Posts: 377 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ US
|
#12
|
An Overclocking app would be cool.
I ran one on my old G1 and Mytouch with no problems. Rooted, of course.
I ran one on my old G1 and Mytouch with no problems. Rooted, of course.
__________________
HNIC target-testing.com
HNIC target-testing.com
| The Following User Says Thank You to That One Guy For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-01-08
, 18:55
|
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ India
|
#13
|
What does it mean?
With the ability to scale in speed from 600MHz to greater than 1GHz, the Cortex-A8 processor can meet the requirements for power-optimized mobile devices
Does it mean that N900's A8 3430 can scale automatically upto 1 Ghz without any problem?or without overclocking?
With the ability to scale in speed from 600MHz to greater than 1GHz, the Cortex-A8 processor can meet the requirements for power-optimized mobile devices
Does it mean that N900's A8 3430 can scale automatically upto 1 Ghz without any problem?or without overclocking?
|
|
2010-01-08
, 18:55
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ United Kingdon
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by schettj
Well i was hoping if the thread developed Underclocking certain cpu states could be discussed, that is also a perfomance gain.
Wow, let's overclock it - then it will be less stable, with shorter battery life.
What could possibly go wrong?
|
|
2010-01-08
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 367 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by plaban
Unfortunately no, it doesn't, not even close (maybe somewhat close). That article just mentions which ARM Cortex A8:s are currently availible.
What does it mean?
With the ability to scale in speed from 600MHz to greater than 1GHz, the Cortex-A8 processor can meet the requirements for power-optimized mobile devices
Does it mean that N900's A8 3430 can scale automatically upto 1 Ghz without any problem?or without overclocking?
That's why I said that the link doesn't say anything about overclocking. Nonetheless, the 3430 can be overclocked (see my previous post).
| The Following User Says Thank You to c0rt3x For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-01-08
, 19:03
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ United Kingdon
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by plaban
No. 1GHZ is almost certainly impossible. I would have hoped that 10% above stock would be achievable but a few people dissagree.
What does it mean?
With the ability to scale in speed from 600MHz to greater than 1GHz, the Cortex-A8 processor can meet the requirements for power-optimized mobile devices
Does it mean that N900's A8 3430 can scale automatically upto 1 Ghz without any problem?or without overclocking?
 |
|
2010-01-08
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by telnet
I haven't really seen complaints about the performance of N900. I think most of us here are more interested in stability and and battery life than pimping our hardware to the fullest. Sure, i've got curiosity what could be done with the N900 processor, but it wouldn't be useful to me, and i suspect any detailed discussion about how to do so on T.M.O would be a net negative in my book. We get enough new incoherent thread titles with too many periods or all CAPS without threads here that actually do describe a way to fry the hardware.
Sorry guys, I came from Win Moibile devices and the guys over at XDA pretty much liked pushing the boundries of devices they had.
The vast majority of custom firmwares are better than the manufaturers by a mile and they have overclocked devices successfully.
IF you read my original post i was asking for comments, not possible would have sufficed.
Strange that other devices have successfully been tweeked and clocked to improve performance and that this device apparantly cant run over 600MHZ or it will fry. Granted i probably posted in the wrong section but guys, seriously..... You guys are acting like we are in the 1800's and im suggesting bulding a machine called a helicopter that can hover. Yep, impossible... go away nutter
__________________
Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
 |
|
2010-01-08
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by telnet
the n900 is using the ondemand scaler, It spends most of its time underclocked already, and it is *off* when idle.
Well i was hoping if the thread developed Underclocking certain cpu states could be discussed, that is also a perfomance gain.
So it's doing it already:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state
600000 727872
550000 4914
500000 6771214
250000 19473164
In other words, most of the time it's 250mhz, when its running at all.
|
|
2010-01-08
, 19:08
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ United Kingdon
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by schettj
That is not entirely true. This isnt a noob overclock forum.
Wow, let's overclock it - then it will be less stable, with shorter battery life.
What could possibly go wrong?
It could be possible to tweak clock settings for a 5-10% boost to 100% CPU state and reduce the cycles of and lower CPU states, which could even INCREASE battery life depending on the device usage.
|
|
2010-01-08
, 19:15
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ United Kingdon
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by schettj
It could be nice to be able to tweak CPU though, id love to play with the stock power states and first step would defo be an underclock on the low power states, if everything in 'almost idle' ran fine at 200mhz then you could see a potential boost to battery life.
the n900 is using the ondemand scaler, It spends most of its time underclocked already, and it is *off* when idle.
So it's doing it already:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state
600000 727872
550000 4914
500000 6771214
250000 19473164
In other words, most of the time it's 250mhz, when its running at all.
Now im begining to think I made a schoolboy error int he Thread title......
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47.
The vast majority of custom firmwares are better than the manufaturers by a mile and they have overclocked devices successfully.
IF you read my original post i was asking for comments, not possible would have sufficed.
Strange that other devices have successfully been tweeked and clocked to improve performance and that this device apparantly cant run over 600MHZ or it will fry. Granted i probably posted in the wrong section but guys, seriously..... You guys are acting like we are in the 1800's and im suggesting bulding a machine called a helicopter that can hover. Yep, impossible... go away nutter