NZtechfreak
|
2009-09-29
, 01:14
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
|
#11
|
|
2009-09-29
, 01:19
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#12
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:19
|
Posts: 149 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ YUL
|
#13
|
Wait it does not support that officially as it can't do 802.11 b/g/n at all? Or that it can with hackery?
|
2009-09-29
, 02:21
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#14
|
optimized to ensure seamless coexistence between GPS, Bluetooth, FM, WLAN and cellular functions.
The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-29
, 02:30
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#15
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:33
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#16
|
That would seem sensible, but the beta kernel indicates a SI4713 chip for FM TX, and a BCM2048 for FM RX. The BCM2048 is BT 2.0+EDR, but the N900 specs say 2.1. Confusing much? I suppose it's possible they switched at the last minute, and this would also explain why FM RX is not supported.
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-29
, 09:31
|
Posts: 149 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ YUL
|
#17
|
|
2009-09-29
, 16:49
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#18
|
That would seem sensible, but the beta kernel indicates a SI4713 chip for FM TX, and a BCM2048 for FM RX. The BCM2048 is BT 2.0+EDR, but the N900 specs say 2.1. Confusing much? I suppose it's possible they switched at the last minute, and this would also explain why FM RX is not supported.
|
2009-09-29
, 18:40
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#19
|
|
2009-09-29
, 18:42
|
Posts: 275 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Raleigh, NC
|
#20
|
Tags |
gps, n900, navilink 6.0 |
|