|
2009-06-25
, 00:53
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#12
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-25
, 06:41
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#13
|
|
2009-06-25
, 06:48
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#14
|
Good to hear the community are still supporting the hardware. Commercialy a company is unlikely to support anything past a year now.
|
2009-06-25
, 06:52
|
Posts: 542 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ 52 N, 6 E
|
#15
|
Well, I detest MicroB too (and hated it even more when they introduced browserd) and much prefer Tear with its webkit. Tear does really show what this hardware can do.
But Nokia could only work with what they had hardware-wise at the time, can't blame 'em for that. Won't argue with you about MicroB though.
|
2009-06-25
, 06:58
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#16
|
|
2009-06-25
, 07:19
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#17
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-25
, 07:36
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#18
|
|
2009-06-25
, 07:40
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
|
2009-06-25
, 10:38
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#20
|
Tags |
benchmark, browser, performance |
|
Too bad, really, but what can you do? Thankfully upgrading the engine in the fully-opensource Fremantle MicroB should be a lot simpler.
Besides, Nokia has plans for XULRunner and WebKit doesn't offer anything equivalent.
Whatever, I've been over all of this several times before. Trust me (or don't) when I say they have good reasons for doing things as they have.
Ryan Abel