|
2011-06-24
, 01:13
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#12
|
|
2011-06-24
, 01:26
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#13
|
Only a whole bunch of non-stockholders would assume that Microsoft was behind it. Top year was 2007. Last good year... been a decline since.
Elop came onboard in last part of 2010.
|
2011-06-24
, 01:44
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,718 |
Thanked: 7,419 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#14
|
|
2011-06-24
, 01:54
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#15
|
...and until that point Microsoft had exterted no pressure on Nokia at all. You know, like for the last fifteen years or so.
|
2011-06-24
, 02:22
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#16
|
I don't deal with hearsay too well. So please prove the pressure by Microsoft onto Nokia starting in 1996 or so by your claim.
And how 11 years later, they grew to be the biggest cellphone manufacturer, had their best year(s)... and the decline came as other companies rose - Google, Apple, RIM, cheap Chinese phones.
Not picking a fight, but all I see is flawed logic unless you prove something.
|
2011-06-24
, 02:29
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#18
|
I'm not sure how you got that from my post. The privilege of choosing how you yourself deal with hearsay is yours and yours alone.
It's possible you see something I do not.
|
2011-06-24
, 02:33
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#19
|
|
2011-06-24
, 03:12
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#20
|
Tags |
boring thread, hatersgonnahate, here be ranting, off topic, oh boy!!! |
|
Elop came onboard in last part of 2010.