Active Topics

 


Page 2 of 31 1 2 3412 Last »
Poll: Is this on or off-topic?
Poll Options
Is this on or off-topic?

Reply
Thread Tools
Flandry's Avatar
Flandry is offline Flandry
2009-10-22 , 15:13
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#11
Rauha: I agreed with you on Engadget, too. Nokia is preemptively rattling its massive lockbox of golden IP nuggets next to Job's head by way of saying "I could crush you like a bug." If Apple trots out its spurious multitouch patent, Nokia can hit them with something that has actually been tried and licensed for years.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
 
Matan is offline Matan
2009-10-22 , 15:19
Posts: 1,224 | Thanked: 1,763 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#12
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Not desperation at all-- companies must defend their patents or risk losing the value of them.
Either this does not mean anything, or it is wrong.

Obviously, if you don't license your patent for money, or sue somone who uses it with no license, you get no monetary value out of it.

On the other hand, if you have a patent and a 100 companies use it for 15 years, and only then you decide to sue one of them, then neither the fact that you waited 15 years nor the fact that you sue only one company and don't bother with 99 others will cause the patent to be less valid.
 
NvyUs's Avatar
NvyUs is offline NvyUs
2009-10-22 , 15:19
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#13
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
My totally uneducated speculation: defensive case for introducing multitouch in Maemo 6 and Symbian ^4.

After Apple sues Nokia for infringing their multitouch patents, sneaky and filthy rich lawyers will do somekind of agreement to drop both cases.
apple do not own multi touch why do people keep saying this matter in fact apple was being sued over multi-touch patent infringments last i heard
http://www.internetnews.com/mobility...le.php/3814451
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20...r-multitouch/1
 
ysss's Avatar
ysss is offline ysss
2009-10-22 , 15:20
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#14
The timing is rather curious.. why now?
Is it due to new technology\components used in new apple products launched within the last few months?
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
 Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
 Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc
Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 
drm is offline drm
2009-10-22 , 15:20
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 108 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#15
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
My totally uneducated speculation: defensive case for introducing multitouch in Maemo 6 and Symbian ^4.

After Apple sues Nokia for infringing their multitouch patents, sneaky and filthy rich lawyers will do somekind of agreement to drop both cases.
I totally agree. Although I think that it’s completely ridicule from apple to make a patent of something so natural has a gesture (to zoom). Imagine if car makers need to pay royalties from the wheel.
 
Rauha is offline Rauha
2009-10-22 , 15:23
Posts: 1,400 | Thanked: 3,751 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Arctic cold of northern .fi
#16
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
apple do not own multi touch why do people keep saying this matter in fact apple was being sued over multi-touch patent infringments last i heard
http://www.internetnews.com/mobility...le.php/3814451
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20...r-multitouch/1
Apple has lots of multi-touch related patents.

I agree that obviously they don't have the kind monopoly in them as most macheadgeeks posting in techblogs think they do. Still, Apple has very strong patent portfolio in multi-touch that could very well be problematic for Nokia.
 
matthewcc is offline matthewcc
2009-10-22 , 15:24
Posts: 267 | Thanked: 128 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Somerville MA - USA
#17
If anyone is following the engadget thread on this there have been some funny "multi-touch" comments.. the fanboys think that apple actualy developed the technology and concept... not just branded the term

http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/n...nts/1#thankYou

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-touch
Last edited by matthewcc; 2009-10-22 at 15:30.
 
Flandry's Avatar
Flandry is offline Flandry
2009-10-22 , 15:24
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#18
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
apple do not own multi touch why do people keep saying this matter in fact apple was being sued over multi-touch patent infringments last i heard
http://www.internetnews.com/mobility...le.php/3814451
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20...r-multitouch/1
From the second article:
Elan's move comes as Apple increases its threats to smartphone manufacturers regarding a patent it claims covers the use of multitouch interfaces on such devices. Should Elan's case be upheld in court, not only would Apple be beholden to the company for licensing, but it would mean its own patent would be invalidated due to prior art – something Apple will be keen to avoid.
Apparently Apple believes differently, which is the point. By having real, enforceable patents that Apple may be in violation of, Nokia can prevent any kind of "we own multitouch" nonsense from Apple.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
 
Texrat's Avatar
Texrat is offline Texrat
2009-10-22 , 15:26
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#19
Originally Posted by Matan View Post
Either this does not mean anything, or it is wrong.

Obviously, if you don't license your patent for money, or sue somone who uses it with no license, you get no monetary value out of it.

On the other hand, if you have a patent and a 100 companies use it for 15 years, and only then you decide to sue one of them, then neither the fact that you waited 15 years nor the fact that you sue only one company and don't bother with 99 others will cause the patent to be less valid.
It means something alright, and you'll have to argue your points with the courts (or you could just research the subject for further info).
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Enyibinakata is offline Enyibinakata
2009-10-22 , 15:26
Posts: 288 | Thanked: 196 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ London
#20
Nothing new. Apple is always stealing other ppls stuff and passing it off as their 'innovation'. Creative scroll click technology as used in iPod comes to mind. They settled of course. Nokia should not accept payment but royalty on every single iPhone sold.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Enyibinakata For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 2 of 31 1 2 3412 Last »

Tags
apple, intellectual property, lawsuit, nokia, nonsense magnet, patent infringement

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top