Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to badger For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-08
, 07:00
|
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Australia
|
#12
|
The device lock is just a lock to stop pressing buttons while in the pocket and stop people using it without asking. It's never been part of the Mail support.
I can't say I've ever seen Exchange force any policy onto any Linux devices I've used with it; short of its own authentication it demands.
I can't say I've ever seen Exchange force any policy onto any Linux devices I've used with it; short of its own authentication it demands.
 |
|
2009-09-08
, 13:18
|
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Europe
|
#13
|
Its part of the Exchange Protocol.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc182279.aspx
This applys to any device which syncs with an Exchange server. Windows Mobile, eSeries Symbian, iPhone all support password enforcement (invoke the device lock after x minutes, require password to unlock).
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc182279.aspx
This applys to any device which syncs with an Exchange server. Windows Mobile, eSeries Symbian, iPhone all support password enforcement (invoke the device lock after x minutes, require password to unlock).
__________________
Some are wise, others are foolish
Some are wise, others are foolish
 |
|
2009-09-08
, 18:37
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Philadelphia, PA
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by RipTorn
This is part of device security which Exchange ActiveSync will require you to activate and to set a password. It has done this with my E71, N95, Moto Q and my iPhone at work. Our Exchange servers only require that the default lock password be changed without strict password policies.
The device lock is just a lock to stop pressing buttons while in the pocket and stop people using it without asking. It's never been part of the Mail support.
I can't say I've ever seen Exchange force any policy onto any Linux devices I've used with it; short of its own authentication it demands.
 |
|
2009-09-08
, 19:20
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#15
|
This IS definitely part of MFE security policy.
But my password is all numeric on my E71 and it works, so assume my V large company feels this is OK. But I'm sure they may change it in the future, so would be really good to make sure this gets fixed.
Mike C
But my password is all numeric on my E71 and it works, so assume my V large company feels this is OK. But I'm sure they may change it in the future, so would be really good to make sure this gets fixed.
Mike C
 |
|
2009-10-17
, 06:54
|
|
Posts: 320 |
Thanked: 763 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Espoo, FInland
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by badger
No. They are not.
They are directly connected.
Originally Posted by badger
OK. And it is up to device to take this into use or not.
When you sync a new device with an Exchange Server, the first thing it does is enforce a its policy to the device. In most cases this includes a password policy - Mine enforces a alphanumeric password.
As the device cannot handle the enforcement of a alphanumeric password, the M4E client will not continue with the sync session and error.
So, what sync problems can occur if device safely ignores this "enforcement"? Why sync will stop to work?
If the device lock functionality cannot support alphanumeric passwords, M4E is dooomed in most mid > large business.
And it sounds brilliant for me as with this "really intelligent" MfE logic in S60 I have lost all my data in S60 phone including photos from my vacations. Just because in one not-so-wonderful moment I have forgotten my password and S60 reformatted my phone :-(
|
|
2009-10-17
, 06:56
|
|
Posts: 320 |
Thanked: 763 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Espoo, FInland
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by badger
It is up to device how shall it support this part of ActiveSync protocol specification.
Its part of the Exchange Protocol.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc182279.aspx
This applys to any device which syncs with an Exchange server. Windows Mobile, eSeries Symbian, iPhone all support password enforcement (invoke the device lock after x minutes, require password to unlock).
|
|
2009-10-17
, 06:58
|
|
Posts: 320 |
Thanked: 763 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Espoo, FInland
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by Gorgon
Not maemo implementation. Thanks, God!
This is part of device security which Exchange ActiveSync will require you to activate and to set a password.
It has done this with my E71, N95, Moto Q and my iPhone at work.
|
|
2009-10-17
, 07:04
|
|
Posts: 320 |
Thanked: 763 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Espoo, FInland
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by badger
Keep ion mind - the link above tells about Windows ActiveSync implementations.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc182279.aspx
"Security Policies on Windows Mobile Powered Devices Managed by Exchange Server"
N900 device is powered by Maemo (linux based OS), not WIndows Mobile.
|
|
2009-10-17
, 08:13
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#20
|
Has anyone got MfE working with their corporate servers?
Mike C
Mike C
 |
| Tags |
| activesync, alphanumeric, exchange, fremantle, maemo, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, non-provisionable, non-provisioning, passcode, password, provisionable, provisioning, security |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:22.
When you sync a new device with an Exchange Server, the first thing it does is enforce a its policy to the device. In most cases this includes a password policy - Mine enforces a alphanumeric password.
As the device cannot handle the enforcement of a alphanumeric password, the M4E client will not continue with the sync session and error.
If the device lock functionality cannot support alphanumeric passwords, M4E is dooomed in most mid > large business.
Some are wise, others are foolish