Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 13 hrs, 12 mins ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 17 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 2 days, 5 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 6 days, 5 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2010-02-18
, 09:23
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#12
|
That's been suggested. Unfortunately, the Exchange sync code is proprietary software so no-one can change it other than Nokia, and they say they won't make it do that.
|
|
2010-02-18
, 09:25
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Stockholm
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by Tex14
My guess, and hope, is never. I wouldn't want that kind of feature on my machine unless I'm the only one that can trigger it.
and provide provisioning for Mail for Exchange so I dont have to carry two devices at once?
 |
|
2010-02-18
, 09:35
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by Tex14
ALL other Nokia devices or just those using Symbian? Different OS and different rules!
cant sync with my server.....other nokia devices are all fine
 |
|
2010-02-18
, 09:36
|
|
Posts: 663 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ London, UK
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by Palleman
Surely the answer to this is a stand alone app that exists in a sandbox? if the exchange admin wants to do anything then he can do.
My guess, and hope, is never. I wouldn't want that kind of feature on my machine unless I'm the only one that can trigger it.
What's i'd say as well is that the exchange admin owns the data - therefore if he wants to wipe it, demand a certain type of password, etc, then he's free to do so. 'my realm, my rules'
__________________
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
|
|
2010-02-18
, 09:54
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Stockholm
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by cashclientel
The Exchange admin doesn't own the data, I do. He owns the server. If he doesn't want my data on his server, then he can disable my account and delete whatever data I've left on the server, and I'll keep my data elsewhere.
What's i'd say as well is that the exchange admin owns the data - therefore if he wants to wipe it, demand a certain type of password, etc, then he's free to do so. 'my realm, my rules'
Same goes for the phone. The phone is owned by my employer (at least officially), but the data on it is mine. If he wants to, he can take the phone back, and I'll keep my data elsewhere.
I don't think a sandbox will be enough. Microsoft will never consider the phone as provisionable as long as the user has unlimited root on it.
|
|
2010-02-18
, 12:04
|
|
Posts: 663 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ London, UK
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by Palleman
I'd estimate that this isn't true in 99% of cases. work emails belong to... work.
The phone is owned by my employer (at least officially), but the data on it is mine.
And like I said, Nokia could make a stand along Exchange application separate from Modest and enable provisioning for it. That way the employer can keep control of their data ('your' work emails) and you can keep your sanity that the boss doesn't have an unleashed worm in your pocket.
__________________
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
|
|
2010-02-18
, 13:37
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Stockholm
|
#18
|
I disagree regarding the data ownership, but I agree that a separate application could be a solution. Then those who agree with you regarding the ownership can use that separate application, and those who don't can just refrain from even installing it.
But I doubt it would be enough for MS. It would be very easy for a user to move stuff out of that provisioned sandbox.
But I doubt it would be enough for MS. It would be very easy for a user to move stuff out of that provisioned sandbox.
|
|
2010-02-18
, 15:43
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 109 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by Fargus
Symbian.....N96, E51
ALL other Nokia devices or just those using Symbian? Different OS and different rules!
 |
|
2010-02-18
, 17:43
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by mikhmv
that would also be my solution if i had the source and i could change it
I would like to have Exchange client which will cheat with server.
It is mean will answer that it is provisioning device but really not....
But i can imagine that Nokia will not or cant do that because they have to conform some rules.
But if the open source community could build an open source solution....
Aren't there any other exchange clients for linux?
 |
| Tags |
| exchange, exchange support, fremantle, goober the sequel, it will never die, maemo, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, non-provisionable, non-provisioning, provisionable, provisioning |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:13.
It is mean will answer that it is provisioning device but really not....