Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 1 hr, 29 mins ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 5 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 1 day, 18 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 5 days, 17 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fuzzillogic For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2018-09-07
, 21:51
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#12
|
There must be a glitch in the matrix, because I'm getting some serious deja vu from that whole Turing campaign.
Very skeptical about this, but if more than one company manages to ship a viable open and privacy focused smartphone using the same chipset, it can only be good for everyone else using that chipset. Could be really positive!
Very skeptical about this, but if more than one company manages to ship a viable open and privacy focused smartphone using the same chipset, it can only be good for everyone else using that chipset. Could be really positive!
|
|
2018-09-08
, 00:58
|
|
Posts: 339 |
Thanked: 1,623 times |
Joined on Oct 2013
@ France
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
Sorry, "obviously" was maybe a bit too strong a word. Wanted to point out that as nothing is known yet (starting developpement based on an idea, or production started and orders now opened), it is too early to even ask if there is a point to follow them.
To clarify [...]
Originally Posted by Fuzzillogic
Looks like the N9 had a single Cortex A8 (OMPA3630) whereas this is a quad core Cortex A9 (bigger pipeline, out of order execution, and other improvements according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar..._ARMv7-A_cores) which is quite a big difference.
Too good? Really? NXP i.MX6 CPU. Cortex A9, you know, the one which was kinda slow in the N9 already.
Not yet a high end iMx8 nor a heavy CPU that can be found in Android's latest, but should still be better than the old time of N9.
Originally Posted by Feathers McGraw
The biggest difference here is that they are not using as much buzzwords as possible, which makes this a lot more possible (iMx6 can be purchased easily in small orders, not like the things TRI "promised").
There must be a glitch in the matrix, because I'm getting some serious deja vu from that whole Turing campaign.
Waiting eagerly for locusf to present the project details.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Zeta For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2018-09-08
, 05:14
|
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 341 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#14
|
Sorry people, not much to comment on but that I have worked on RCM and in NecunoS for a period of time.
Originally Posted by Zeta
Obviously:
By the way, I missed the twitter feed the first time : https://twitter.com/necunoscom
And found this pdf document on their website : https://necunos.com/rcm.pdf with this name on it :
We know someone in this community with this name, mostly by is nickname locusf.
There is an old tweet containing the name of necunoscom that he retweeted so could really be from him.
That would also explain why the people who retweeted the 2 tweets from the account of necuno are from the Nemo community.
At least we have now an idea of who is being it, so may not be as big a trap as other were. We'll see what they propose in the future, but it looks like with a CPU that old that they only target people like on this forum, which so far lead to projects in small quantity with small team, so high price regarding performances and big delays. But would be glad to be wrong !
| The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to locusf For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2018-09-08
, 05:51
|
|
Posts: 1,293 |
Thanked: 4,319 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#15
|
I noticed the tweet, and also found that locusf was involved.
So, I am interrested, most for the reasons that its open source, both in hardware, and software. And that a community member is involved - may I add, for me, a highly respected member. And I will absolutely join, wether high, middle or low- end hardware specs.
Will be interresting with a price-tag, that, for me, might slow down how fast I can make a purchase.
So, I am interrested, most for the reasons that its open source, both in hardware, and software. And that a community member is involved - may I add, for me, a highly respected member. And I will absolutely join, wether high, middle or low- end hardware specs.
Will be interresting with a price-tag, that, for me, might slow down how fast I can make a purchase.
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
You can still support my work by donation - click here
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2018-09-08
, 08:13
|
|
Posts: 1,293 |
Thanked: 4,319 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by kinggo
Thats about the worst comparison, like, ever.
WTF? iphone 4 without the button
Anyhow, not interested in another nothing but blablabla privacy blabla open blablabla......
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
You can still support my work by donation - click here
 |
|
2018-09-08
, 08:16
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by kinggo
Yes, that is a common euphemism for "unusable in the real world".
Anyhow, not interested in another nothing but blablabla privacy blabla open blablabla......
But some people like it
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
|
|
2018-09-08
, 08:18
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by nieldk
I was wondering about that too. I 'thanked' that post for the second sentence, not the first.
Thats about the worst comparison, like, ever.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 |
|
2018-09-08
, 08:23
|
|
Posts: 943 |
Thanked: 3,228 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Zagreb
|
#20
|
hardly.......... since there is nothing to compare but a few buzz words
Anyway, IMO, what the world need is a commercially successful 3rd OS first and then we can dream from that onwards. Otherwise we will always end up with useless device that no day to day service will support.
Anyway, IMO, what the world need is a commercially successful 3rd OS first and then we can dream from that onwards. Otherwise we will always end up with useless device that no day to day service will support.
| The Following User Says Thank You to kinggo For This Useful Post: | ||
I'm not asking for the latest greatest, but a 64 bit cpu with some A72 cores, or otherwise web browsing will simply be slow.
On the OS-front they've said next to nothing. What if they present something like Tizen, with "HTML5 apps"-dreck? (On those Cortex A9 cores
Last but not least: "read the blog", but no RSS/Atom feed anywhere.
Meh. While I don't wear a tinfoil hat, I think I am part of their target audience. Still, I'm unconvinced at best.