|
2009-06-27
, 06:36
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#12
|
True. This will most likely be fixed. (And, actually, after opening it the first time, each subsequent launch was quicker.)
But it has pretty robust and smooth kinetic scrolling by dragging your finger.
The Following User Says Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-27
, 06:40
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#13
|
|
2009-06-27
, 07:53
|
|
Posts: 250 |
Thanked: 122 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Colorado
|
#14
|
|
2009-06-27
, 10:16
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-27
, 12:37
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#16
|
|
2009-06-27
, 14:43
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#17
|
The digi@web browser is way better than the fennec browser.
You guys should try it.
|
2009-06-27
, 15:29
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#18
|
The UI is nicer than in beta 1, it's faster and some pages are rendered perfectly, but even though it's coming along great, it still has a long way to go. Also, I agree with Tim on the install size...ouch!
Maybe some screenies for people that wanna see it before installing it?
Jesse~
|
2009-06-27
, 15:58
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#19
|
|
2009-06-27
, 15:59
|
|
Posts: 250 |
Thanked: 122 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Colorado
|
#20
|
Tim
http://samoff.com