The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ejasmudar For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-10
, 04:24
|
Posts: 4,030 |
Thanked: 1,633 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ nd usa
|
#12
|
|
2010-12-10
, 10:56
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#14
|
It is much better to make Android 2.2 works perfectly on N900 first before porting Android 2.3.. Watcha think?
The Following User Says Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-10
, 11:34
|
Posts: 4,030 |
Thanked: 1,633 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ nd usa
|
#16
|
|
2010-12-10
, 13:47
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 426 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy, Lombardia
|
#17
|
This is true.
It is much easier to get a proper Android build by using Eclair over Froyo, and Froyo over Eclaire.
Why?
Sources!
The Nitdroid dev is actually borrowing code from the AOSP and several android phones (including stacks and drivers) and meshing the ones that work together.
If they started with a new kernel, used the 2.3 AOSP, it is likely (certain?) that most of the "fixes" will break and will require fixing or replaced with code that is compatible.
So in short: Gingerbread = slower Nitdroid development
(it's just the way it is, unless Nokia provides the linux-derived hardware drivers for each component)
|
2010-12-10
, 14:02
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 194 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ UK
|
#18
|
It is much better to make Android 2.2 works perfectly on N900 first before porting Android 2.3.. Watcha think?
|
2010-12-10
, 23:37
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 278 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oregon, USA
|
#19
|
|
2010-12-22
, 19:13
|
Posts: 44 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ pakistan
|
#20
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rkpathai For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
android, gingerbread, i forgot woops, look future, throw past |
|
Please see the activities section of this page: http://gitorious.org/android-n900
The last activity is 2 years in the future (Jan 2012) , but even on days as recent as December 8th, we see work is going on..