|
2009-04-20
, 16:05
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#12
|
The only interesting thing to me about speculating is the why. And my opinion is that every reason Nokia has given or will give for the following decisions has been or will be bullsh*t. And by bullsh*t I mean that Nokia continues to sacrifice a good computing experience for a trendy one..
- Removal of dpad from outside case
- Removal of stylus and stylus holder from product
- Removal of stylus keyboard from application framework
- Eventual removal of resistive touch screen
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ragnar For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-20
, 17:07
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#13
|
Please reread the thread title. This is speculation. My why speculation is based on actual product and forum comments from Nokia employees. I then twist them accordingly. The "no why before what" comment made no sense to me.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-20
, 17:43
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#14
|
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-20
, 18:27
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#15
|
Well, obviously our primary aim is to provide a good mobile user experience. It kind of depends what one means by "trendy". "Trends" can be seen as solutions that people are generally leaning towards, and as such aren't necessarily bad or good. Nobody here is trying to be "trendy", we've got better things to do.
It is possible that we don't agree on what makes a good mobile computing user experience, but it's hard to comment more before concrete product launches. Perhaps we have come back to these questions and reasonings after such an event.
The Following User Says Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-20
, 23:13
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#16
|
|
2009-04-21
, 18:09
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#19
|
Well, obviously our primary aim is to provide a good mobile user experience. It kind of depends what one means by "trendy". "Trends" can be seen as solutions that people are generally leaning towards, and as such aren't necessarily bad or good. Nobody here is trying to be "trendy", we've got better things to do.
It is possible that we don't agree on what makes a good mobile computing user experience, but it's hard to comment more before concrete product launches. Perhaps we have come back to these questions and reasonings after such an event.
|
2009-04-21
, 18:37
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#20
|
Well, it's not obvious that your primary aim is to provide a good mobile experience. Providing a good mobile experience seems to be your secondary or less aim. What does seem obvious is that selling lots of product at the highest margin possible is your primary aim. Trying to provide a good mobile experience might be one way to that end, but at the moment it seems that you have nothing better to do than be "trendy." And I speculate that your board members would agree with me.
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
i want my mtv, pass the butter, pub talk, wet dreams, wishful thinking |
|
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net