The Following User Says Thank You to shallimus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-02-24
, 19:55
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 242 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Finland
|
#12
|
|
2014-02-24
, 19:59
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#13
|
While Swype have apparently already said that there's nothing in the pipeline
The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-02-24
, 20:02
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#14
|
The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-02-24
, 20:36
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#15
|
I fully agree. Swyping (or swiping) itself is not big issue to implement. The algorithm is and dictionaries and when those are in place even this "hund-and-peak" - meaning pressing each key individually - technique will be fast. It will require not only text prediction but autocorrection. Best autocorrect algorithms can logically find correct work even when no character typed/swiped/swyped is correct.
|
2014-02-24
, 21:05
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#16
|
|
2014-02-25
, 13:12
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 91 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ poor Slovenia
|
#17
|
|
2014-06-30
, 07:08
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Paris / France
|
#18
|
TLDR: I miss Swype. Lots of people miss Swype. We need Swype on Sailfish, or something similar which is just as good.
The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to eber42 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-30
, 19:42
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Paris / France
|
#19
|
The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to eber42 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-30
, 19:47
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#20
|
Tags |
bettertxtentry, huntnpeck sucks, okboard, sailfish, swype |
|
Sailfish want list: calendar bugfixes, glanceable agenda, Swype or similar
Evolution continues (but we're still pre-Cambrian)