![]() |
2007-11-06
, 19:37
|
Posts: 122 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ A quiet place.
|
#11
|
![]() |
2007-11-06
, 21:22
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ United Kingdom
|
#12
|
In the UK I tend to find that people either keep their phones until they die completely (and these people wouldn't be buying an IT in the first place) or change them annually. Most UK contracts are 12 months, although 18 months is starting to appear more often.
|
2007-11-06
, 22:31
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#13
|
But seriously, I think you've done a good job highlighting why so many of us don't want to have our internet tablets be an all-in-one convergence device. As long as we have bluetooth, we can tether our tablets to whatever data plan gets rolled out and incorporated in our cellular service (if that's what we desire). And with Linux, we don't have to worry about platform lockout; we can do pretty much what we will with our hardware.
![]() |
2007-11-06
, 22:42
|
|
Posts: 201 |
Thanked: 88 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#14
|
Yeah, good point. I believe that most consumers (at least in the US; can't speak for elsewhere) view their phones as somewhat disposable, in that they assume they are going to upgrade every two years or so. I like the idea of holding onto my IT for a few years longer.
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 01:25
|
|
Posts: 1,361 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
#15
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 15:19
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ United Kingdom
|
#16
|
I need to ask this question... If it were *any* other company that made the 770, n800, or n810, would the cell issue be such a hotly contested one?
![]() |
2007-11-08
, 12:59
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#17
|
![]() |
2007-11-08
, 13:25
|
|
Posts: 201 |
Thanked: 88 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#18
|
I need to ask this question... If it were *any* other company that made the 770, n800, or n810, would the cell issue be such a hotly contested one?
I largely agree with you. The IT should be judged on its merits as a handheld computer. A small part of this though depends on it being an always connected device. There are some handheld computers that have the advantage of HSDPA chips, but the vast majority do not.
![]() |
2007-11-08
, 14:04
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#19
|
When I think of handheld computer, I think of Nokia's IT series, the OQO computers, and Sony's UX series. The IT is the only one of the three without cellular internet... I think "does it have integrated WWAN?" is a perfectly reasonable thing to look at when considering a handheld computer.
wireless & networking
* Wireless LAN: Atheros tri-mode 802.11a/b/g with diversity
* Bluetooth technology: Integrated Bluetooth 2.0 with EDR
* Ethernet protocol: VGA/Ethernet adapter (included)
![]() |
2007-11-08
, 14:20
|
|
Posts: 201 |
Thanked: 88 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#20
|