|
2008-02-15
, 01:32
|
Posts: 213 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#12
|
|
2008-02-15
, 15:38
|
|
Posts: 772 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
@ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
|
#13
|
|
2008-02-15
, 16:10
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#14
|
|
2008-02-17
, 00:33
|
|
Posts: 880 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to speculatrix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-02-18
, 06:02
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Detroit
|
#16
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vabgeo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-03-19
, 23:38
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#17
|
|
2008-03-19
, 23:51
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#18
|
|
2008-03-19
, 23:57
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#19
|
|
2008-03-20
, 02:26
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Detroit
|
#20
|
I think this would answer most of the needs for local search based on GPS location with limited effort.
So the more I think about it, the simpler it seems, except that it's still above my very limited programming skills.
The services you mention, Cat, are not currently tied to any mobile GPS service. That's the missing link.
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net