![]() |
2008-07-22
, 13:31
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#12
|
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 13:47
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#13
|
It seems to me that building an el cheapo subtablet isn't exactly rocket science (anymore). If the people who are now developing the Pandora had left out the keypad, they'd have made one in basically under two years from idea to realisation, without any big corporation and without containers full of money.
The main problem for a tablet, and especially a subtablet, is the user interface first and useful applications second. This is where Nokia's tablets really suck: The user interface was designed without any vision or "grand plan" and the applications are basically retaylored Linux desktop applications. The only people who are content with these tablets are apparently either Linux sysadmins who like to have a portable terminal and people who are only interested in looking at content, not creating it.
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 18:29
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#14
|
I think the 5 steps vision has not been a secret for some time, you are just too impatient :-)
I think we are starting only now -maybe- to have available HW that is somehow close to what 770 would have been if we had had the chance to really implement it according to our wishes.
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#15
|
You don't need the latest hardware for good ui and useful applications. In some respects for example the old Apple Newtons are still superior as Sean Luke has argued here and here. I think it would be very interesting if they manage to pull this off without any 5 year plan with 'steps'.
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 19:02
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#16
|
I think we are starting only now -maybe- to have available HW that is somehow close to what 770 would have been if we had had the chance to really implement it according to our wishes.
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 20:20
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#17
|
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 20:27
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#18
|
You beat me to it. Which of the five steps is the one called: "Develop temporary crappy UI and do not include useful applications"?
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 20:42
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 137 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Boone, IA
|
#19
|
OTOH, I see applications around me that might become killer apps for these subtablets. Take e.g. EverNote, a note-taking, information collecting application that outperforms Microsoft's OneNote in all aspects. A tablet version of such an app could -- nay: Is! -- immensely useful, provided that tablet has an efficient text entry system (and for a tablet that means HWR). It is flexible enough that most people won't even need a dedicated PIM and with the new connected features it has entered the "Cloud Era" as well.
![]() |
2008-07-22
, 20:56
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#20
|
I gotta say that this is a genius marketing move by Arrington.
Making it an open source hardware creates buzz for the product. There will probably be follow up articles, informal polls, etc...basically generating more interesting content for his websites.
If this inexpensive internet tablet that caters to the larger market does succeed, it means more people going online, which circles back to more hits for TechCrunch.
Whether or not the product succeeds does not really matter. Arrington already wins.
I'm eager to see how this experiment turns out.