|
2009-02-10
, 13:54
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-02-17
, 22:54
|
|
Posts: 284 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ London, UK
|
#13
|
|
2009-02-18
, 00:56
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#14
|
|
2009-02-18
, 03:21
|
|
Posts: 903 |
Thanked: 632 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#15
|
|
2009-02-18
, 05:26
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 137 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Boone, IA
|
#16
|
|
2009-02-18
, 23:25
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#17
|
Flash apps need to have an additional application open (usually the browser) and tend to suck an unholy amount of cpu cycles. Then again, an inefficiently coded Python program can to, but...
The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-02-18
, 23:56
|
|
Posts: 903 |
Thanked: 632 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#18
|
I'm not seeing it so much... With no connection and a few screen applets running Hildon -Desktop accounts for about a 3% load. I also see Xomap @ about 1% and nothing else is active.
Now when I open the flash I linked to earlier (>> Clicky <<), Xomap jumps to 3% and Browserd opens @ 2-5% load. Shortly there after Xomap settles back down to 1% for a net increase of about 2 to 8%.
Not so much as to forsake a whole class of ready made apps... We do call it an Internet Tablet after all.
|
2009-02-19
, 01:21
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#19
|
How are you testing? Via "Top"? I say this because my load-applet shows between 2-3 (out of 4) bars of cpu usage while that specific Flash app is open. Once you switch away from it, to another application (say, X-Term w/ Top running?), the cpu usage goes way down. But that isn't a valid indication for obvious reasons.
To get a *real* reading, try ssh'ing into your tablet and see the cpu usage while the flash app is the toplevel window
|
2009-02-19
, 01:29
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#20
|
I wonder if there is something that could be done to make it use less cpu%? I could probably patch it to work with the (apparently) new hildon color chooser api, but optimizing is beyond my ability...
Python gurus?