Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Lord Raiden's Avatar
Posts: 1,562 | Thanked: 349 times | Joined on Jun 2008
#11
Well, while I liked the OpenMoko project, with Maemo, Android and Symbian all being open source, OpenMoko is more or less redundant. It's not like I think that redundant is bad, but in this case it was.
__________________
Popular Sci-Fi author and creator of the Earthfleet Series.
www.realmsofimagination.net
 
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#12
the difference with openmoko was that the hardware is open.

maemo is only partly open, and android isn't open at all once it's on a consumer phone.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#13
IMO, they missed their window of opportunity. Their own lack of delivery (keeping ahead, or even keep up with, the rest of the industry) made themselves irrelevant. OpenPandora is about to do the same thing, IMO. If you take too long, then whatever lead you had vanishes, as other people with faster delivery are able to move into whatever niche you had identified (even if they don't do it as well at first).

There have been moments where I have wondered the same thing about the NIT platform, post-N810. They're taking too long. Other players are moving into the same niche. By the time the Maemo 5 device is out, will anyone still care about buying a NIT? Will those who prefer windows, but bought a NIT because it was the only player, have moved to devices like Samsung's N810 clone that runs WinMO? Or to a Windows x86 MID? Will those who prefer linux/unix have moved on to an Ubuntu (ARM or x86) MID because it delivered the right feature-set before the Maemo 5 device came to market? Only the die-hards will still be around if Nokia takes too long. And only Apple has enough die-hards to make a lasting market just on that basis.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:38.