The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 14:56
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#12
|
I'm confused by the negativity surrounding these discussions. We're all on the same side here, so there's hardly a need to be accusatory or nasty in your posting.
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#13
|
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 15:58
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#14
|
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 16:10
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#15
|
Where is Nokia the corporation in all this with regard to anything maemo.org the council or this forum?
Will paid employees of Nokia direct or administer this forum in the future?
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 16:55
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#16
|
... lingering trademark confusion, of Maemo*...
*penguinbait, to address the correction earlier more helpfully, the reason why it's most certainly not the "Maemo Council" (which is the same reason why "Maemo.org" is inappropriate) is because when you say "Maemo", what you're actually saying is "Nokia".
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mullf For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 17:09
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#17
|
Right on the front page it says "Copyright © 2002-2009 Nokia Corporation".
If it is not Nokia, then perhaps MaemoCommunity.org (maemocommunity.org) would be a better web address than Maemo.org (maemo.org)
since I doubt a lot of people will catch that "maemo" is something different than "Maemo".
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 17:43
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#18
|
The Following User Says Thank You to penguinbait For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 17:44
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#19
|
Employees of Maemo SW and Nokia are members of the Maemo Community just like the rest us.
Um, well, there's something about it in the election page on the wiki, but no, I don't think anybody's done an in-depth analysis of this or anything.
No more than any other community member might "direct" maemo.org. Of course, the "maemo.org four" have a lot of influence in the direction of maemo.org, but they're employees of maemo.org, and not really employees of Nokia (although Nokia is paying their salaries).
Sure, as long as they make it apparent that they're affiliated with Nokia (this applies to contractors like Igalia and OpenHanded, too).
Well, Quim is a moderator now and the recent forum reorganization was largely his idea. So, yes, but it's not anything underhanded or subversive (which is where it seems these questions are headed).
...No more than any other community member might "direct" maemo.org. Of course, the "maemo.org four" have a lot of influence in the direction of maemo.org, but they're employees of maemo.org, and not really employees of Nokia (although Nokia is paying their salaries).
![]() |
2009-04-05
, 17:56
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#20
|
This is as good a thread to ask than any... Where is Nokia the corporation in all this with regard to anything maemo.org, the council, or this forum?
Are there links you can provide me to better explain this.
I mean, are paid employees of Nokia directing maemo.org? Can a paid employee of Nokia be a council member? Will paid employees of Nokia direct or administer this forum in the future?
Just wondering...
Ryan Abel