|
2009-05-06
, 01:18
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#12
|
There was a proposal made on 2009-03-10 that was discussed through a week and about 50 posts before Reggie executed the changes.
You might argue that was a short period of time. Fair enough. On the othr hand if you follow the posters and the thanks you see that most of the usual suspects had a say, so it looked like having reached a critical mass for a change.
No votes, but no huge discussion either. There were many opinions and the original proposal evolved to integrate them.
I notice this is the opposite approach you have: throw a poll first and discuss after. Well, in my experience discussion helps to reach consensus while polls tend to stress divisions and polarize the debate. This is why I think voting is a last resort for making community decisions, not the first one.
of those other two polls, around 75 user / 150 users voted. How many of them voiced their opinion in the thread?? Not 75/150, So poll numbers help shore up and support positions and give validity to people opinions. In fact if you look at the thread, the opinions appear pretty evenly matched, while the polls show quite a different outcome.
It's like in this poll. You say "I don't have an answer, I only post to you my problem as I see it." but in fact you do have an answer and quite clear. The poll is a means for you to know how much support you get for that answer: "I want my advocates "Maemo Community Council" to promote important issues up to the community for discussion in a consistent manner in a consistent location." (2h after opening the poll)
You could have started with the proposal you actually have in mind asking for feedback to contest it or improve it.
|
2009-05-06
, 02:02
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#13
|
> The maemo-community list sounds like redundant now. Most of the people active there are active here. We clould consider closing it and we would have one redundant channel less.
Most is really not enough, however.
|
2009-05-06
, 02:18
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#14
|
There have been a lot of changes going on around here. Lots of discussions, and lots of people missing them...
|
2009-05-06
, 02:33
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#15
|
|
2009-05-06
, 02:34
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#16
|
Most of these items are usually summed up in some way (if not in the form of actual aggregated posts) at http://maemo.org/news/planet-maemo/ .
That aside, I'm all for extirpating some of the mailing lists (or all of them) now that talk.maemo.org exists. This is a completely applicable...er...forum for that sort of discussion to occur.
Tim
|
2009-05-06
, 03:22
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#17
|
...I just think then there should be a sub-forum that topics are only startable by Maemo Council or Maemo proper or Reggie or Quim or whoever should be on that list...
The Following User Says Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-06
, 09:43
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#18
|
Is there something wrong with http://maemo.org/community/council/ ?
Just wondering. Do these items need to be here instead of there? If so, that's fine, but I'd like some sort of justifiable reason.
Tim
Most is really not enough, however. I'm against this proposal, personally.
It's not a matter of awareness. Some people really don't like forums.
The solution here is the mailing list integration into vBulletin, not the closing of a list and the certain loss of several important members.
The Following User Says Thank You to lemmyslender For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-06
, 11:15
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#19
|
It's not a matter of awareness. Some people really don't like forums.
The solution here is the mailing list integration into vBulletin, not the closing of a list and the certain loss of several important members.
The Following User Says Thank You to fpp For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-06
, 11:41
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#20
|
The Following User Says Thank You to penguinbait For This Useful Post: | ||
Ryan Abel