![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:10
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#12
|
![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:13
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#13
|
In this case, it's both. The feelgood speeches cannot deny that wholly. Fremantle will fix current issues in Diablo, require new hardware, allow the community to inherit some of it's architecture, while basically becoming a deadend itself shortly thereafter.
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:16
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#14
|
A single use (once per device) OS...
... The feelgood speeches cannot deny that wholly. Fremantle will fix current issues in Diablo, require new hardware, allow the community to inherit some of it's architecture, while basically becoming a deadend itself shortly thereafter.
So is it worth the upgrade? If you desire any of these functionalities, Windows Mobile 2003 SE is definitely worth a look, but just because you want it doesn't mean you'll be able to get it...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:20
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#15
|
I agree with you on the risk of parts of it becoming a deadend shortly thereafter. Which is one of the reasons Mer is actually 'MaEmo Reconstructed", and not "Fremantle backport to N8x0". While a backport may have been easier, such a backport would be unsustainable and would become a deadend shortly after as more developers move on to newer devices. So, we decided to take the difficult road - which does take longer time but will be more interesting over time.
![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:31
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#16
|
A single use (once per device) OS with the majority of it's UI/presentational layer being replaced and those prior parts being deprecated almost as fast as it comes out spells out (to me) that Fremantle will be as stillborn as Diablo.
The kind ways of stating "no, it'll be continued to be supported by the community" yields no comfort from a future purchase because thrice over people have been limited to a Nokia device that has no clear method to upgrade to the next version using their re-appropriated machine due to either hardware or software limitations.
The Following User Says Thank You to silvermountain For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-07-30
, 23:43
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#17
|
I agree with you on the risk of parts of it becoming a deadend shortly thereafter. Which is one of the reasons Mer is actually 'MaEmo Reconstructed", and not "Fremantle backport to N8x0". While a backport may have been easier, such a backport would be unsustainable and would become a deadend shortly after as more developers move on to newer devices. So, we decided to take the difficult road - which does take longer time but will be more interesting over time.
![]() |
2009-07-30
, 23:54
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#18
|
So... for a non-developer, plain ol' consumer, real world user of an existing Nokia iT... purchasing the presumably much more expensive Freemantle device is not a very good upgrade strategy.
|
2009-07-30
, 23:55
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
I know that my views are simplistic but I also think that I may represent a part of the potential customer base for the N900 and I'm curious as to how Nokia is/will be addressing such concerns).
![]() |
2009-07-31
, 06:52
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 182 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Leeds UK
|
#20
|
Besides, we don't yet know if Harmattan is going to be targetted at RX-51 style hardware; which I guess will depend on the timescales.
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org