Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 9 hrs, 58 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 22 hrs ago - more...
Bratag |
2009-10-05
, 13:31
|
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#11
|
That was a great video and I am impressed with how well this system handles both browsing and multi tasking.
|
|
2009-10-05
, 13:36
|
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Bronx, New York
|
#12
|
That's a good vid it performed well over 3g connection they were using as well....
|
|
2009-10-05
, 16:31
|
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#13
|
Right thats it! I'am gonna get me an N900! LOL
|
|
2009-10-05
, 18:37
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ São Paulo (Brazil)
|
#14
|
Interesting video.
As usual, I'm concerned with performance. Scrolling normal sites appears to be fine (but worse than iPhone), but some Flash content is specially slow.
Youtube seems to stutter a bit and the game they showed seems like a slideshow. Not sure though as I've never played that one.
It seems like many people here think it's fast. I don't.
The Youtube videos performance could probably be solved by playing them in the media player (VLC anyone?). Flash in Linux is painfully slow (even on my desktop).
I've read someone saying that "Flash in Linux is not a feature, it's a bug". Unfortunatelly that is quite correct
.
PS: Despite all problems I still want one.
As usual, I'm concerned with performance. Scrolling normal sites appears to be fine (but worse than iPhone), but some Flash content is specially slow.
Youtube seems to stutter a bit and the game they showed seems like a slideshow. Not sure though as I've never played that one.
It seems like many people here think it's fast. I don't.
The Youtube videos performance could probably be solved by playing them in the media player (VLC anyone?). Flash in Linux is painfully slow (even on my desktop).
I've read someone saying that "Flash in Linux is not a feature, it's a bug". Unfortunatelly that is quite correct
.PS: Despite all problems I still want one.
|
|
2009-10-05
, 18:53
|
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by NicolasF
Are you on crack?
Interesting video.
As usual, I'm concerned with performance. Scrolling normal sites appears to be fine (but worse than iPhone), but some Flash content is specially slow.
Youtube seems to stutter a bit and the game they showed seems like a slideshow. Not sure though as I've never played that one.
It seems like many people here think it's fast. I don't.
The Youtube videos performance could probably be solved by playing them in the media player (VLC anyone?). Flash in Linux is painfully slow (even on my desktop).
I've read someone saying that "Flash in Linux is not a feature, it's a bug". Unfortunatelly that is quite correct
PS: Despite all problems I still want one.
The youtube vid he played was a HD vid and played damn near better than my laptop does.
The flash game was a tower defense game and looked to be shooting at correct speed and crawlers moving just fine.
I was blown away that it worked as well as it did especially over 3g.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-10-05
, 19:05
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ São Paulo (Brazil)
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by Bratag
I really hope you're right and I'm wrong, but it's not what I have seen on this video and others, and anyone that uses Flash in Linux knows that it is poorly implementated.
Are you on crack?
The youtube vid he played was a HD vid and played damn near better than my laptop does.
The flash game was a tower defense game and looked to be shooting at correct speed and crawlers moving just fine.
I was blown away that it worked as well as it did especially over 3g.
But as I've said I still want a N900, and still trying to find out how can I buy one, as I live in Brazil.
|
|
2009-10-05
, 19:15
|
|
Posts: 835 |
Thanked: 772 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Finland
|
#17
|
I can only see HD written in the title but the player still miss HD button as you usually see on HD youtube videos. This doesn't really count as playing HD video from youtube right ? 
Last edited by Kozzi; 2009-10-05 at 19:17.
Last edited by Kozzi; 2009-10-05 at 19:17.
|
|
2009-10-05
, 19:24
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ São Paulo (Brazil)
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by Kozzi
Yes. It's not real HD as far as I can tell. On my PC some videos have larger size (like the one shown), which is heavier and has better quality, but it's not HD.
I can only see HD written in the title but the player still miss HD button as you usually see on HD youtube videos. This doesn't really count as playing HD video from youtube right ?
|
|
2009-10-05
, 19:28
|
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 98 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
#19
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M11SvDtPBhA
this is the video in the video (that sounds weird)
so...... why isnt the hd button in the browser of the n900?
this is the video in the video (that sounds weird)
so...... why isnt the hd button in the browser of the n900?
|
|
2009-10-05
, 19:43
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ São Paulo (Brazil)
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by r0eladn
I doubt it would handle it. My Acer Aspire One won't (at least with Linpus Linux). It's an Intel Atom 1.6GHz. Probably faster than the Cortex used in N900 (not by much).
so...... why isnt the hd button in the browser of the n900?