|
2009-11-05
, 15:24
|
Posts: 266 |
Thanked: 83 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#12
|
|
2009-11-05
, 16:16
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#13
|
"Videos files: The Nokia N900 is capable of playing DVD-resolution videos. The real issue is to find digital video files that have been properly sized and compressed to take advantage of the device's screen and decoding capabilities. "
What does he mean??
Video playback formats: Video playback file formats: .mp4, .avi, .wmv, .3gp; codecs: H.264, MPEG-4, Xvid, WMV, H.263. Video streaming formats: H.264, MPEG-4, Xvid, WMV, H.263 in .avi, .mp4, .wmv, .asf and .3gp containers.
|
2009-11-05
, 16:37
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Dominican Republic
|
#14
|
|
2009-11-05
, 17:09
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#15
|
Again an Again.....
Why do you have to compare the n900 with the iphone? its the n900 for the same target ? i dont think so.
As i said before iphone its for my sister and my little brother, cmon guys grow up, if you want a boring device like iphone just buy one and stop argue about the n900 and the iphone.
my opinion again.
|
2009-11-05
, 17:27
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#16
|
I've had occasional lag, but I get that on my PC too.
Yeah, overall, I'm VERY impressed with Flash and YouTube in particular. BIG improvements over N8xx.
|
2009-11-05
, 17:53
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#17
|
|
2009-11-05
, 18:11
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#18
|
He was talking about Hulu.com when he said it wasn't usable. He specifically mentioned youtube.com worked fine. Hulu.com doesn't work really at all, I guess because they use better codecs or a higher resolution or something.
The reviewer was apparently clueless about Flash 10 mobile, even though it made big news a few weeks ago. I understand that Flash 10 has better optimizations for the current ARM platform. Funny that he thought it was up to Nokia to make it faster. I'm sure they would if they had the power to.
The only other "huh?" part was where he noted that its nice that you can use your fingernail, but that he wished it had multitouch. As I understand it, its impossible to have both. I rather like being able to use my fingernail.
I'm still waiting for some reviewer to post my main gripe: what kind of 'mobile computer' doesn't have an external card slot? I was looking forward to being able to post pictures from my camera. I guess pretty much all reviews jibe Nokia for calling a smartphone a mobile computer so I can't complain.
But overall I thought it was a good and fair review.
|
2009-11-05
, 18:21
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#19
|
|
2009-11-05
, 18:35
|
Posts: 367 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#20
|
I found it interesting that the GPU in the iphone SGX535 is faster (more polygons per sec) that the GPU in the N900 SGX530. Its incredible how the iphone 3gs has been out for months and has better hardware than alot of the phones barley being released now
I don't think that sounded at all like a Iphone fanboy. That was by far the fairest review of a non-capacitive screen I have seen. As a non-believer, that was a relief. I read one iFanboy who complained how wearisome it was to have to press a resistive screen. I know the turtleneck crowd is starving to send all available money to the cult headquarters, but noone is allowed to be that weak.