Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 44 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ WA, USA
#11
it worked ok (ex 2010). Somehow N900 did not ask me for the pin??? The policy is enforced and with WiMo, G1 with "TouchDown" both forced me for a pin.

confused here...???
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#12
Originally Posted by tokuro View Post
Somehow N900 did not ask me for the pin??? The policy is enforced and with WiMo, G1 with "TouchDown" both forced me for a pin.
It means that the policy is NOT forced by the server. Your server agrees to work with non-provisionable devices and N900 is non-provisionable device.

By the way, if you want the phone to be locked you can do it from the phone UI. Lock settings can be found in the control panel.

Last edited by vitaly_repin; 2009-12-01 at 06:21.
 
Posts: 44 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ WA, USA
#13
ok. then how did other folks getting policy forced on non-provisionable device, N900?
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#14
there is no way of doing that, there is just no possibility to implement these policies under Maemo 5 / Linux right now.

if your server allows non-provisionable devices, it's all good, if it doesn't, synchronization won't work.
 
Posts: 44 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ WA, USA
#15
"TouchDown" on G1 implimented that "pin" feature by adding that to the app itself. On WinMo devices, the pin lock woud apply to the device, not the app.

I'm glad that N900 does work with my company's Exchange 2010 implimentation. But as being a good corp user, i should have PIN enabled on the app, at least (i do hate device lock on WinMO, though i understand that from security point of view).
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#16
Originally Posted by tokuro View Post
"TouchDown" on G1 implimented that "pin" feature by adding that to the app itself.
i doubt that that makes it a provisionable device. it just works because your company allows non-provisionable ones to connect, else the N900 wouldn't sync at all.
and since non-provisionable is allowed, you don't need the pin feature anyways.

but better wait for vitaly to reply
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#17
Originally Posted by tokuro View Post
ok. then how did other folks getting policy forced on non-provisionable device, N900?
Can't get your question, sorry. Could you explain the use case?
 
Posts: 3 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#18
Hi, what parameters dit you set for echange 2010 ?
 
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#19
Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
Hi,

Currently I am unable to use Mail for Exchange since the current firmware (1.2009-42-11) contains a bug with Exchange 2003.

We use hosted exchange and will port to Exchange 2010 tomorrow. Will the N900 MfE support this?

Thx,
Martin
My nokia n900 does not even work with my exchange server 2007...........I doubt it will work with 2010
 
Posts: 287 | Thanked: 127 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Sweden
#20
Originally Posted by Guber99 View Post
My nokia n900 does not even work with my exchange server 2007...........I doubt it will work with 2010
Due to what? Exchange 2007 should work if the server is fully patched and allows non-provisionable devices. In that case, file a bug.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to floffe For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01.