Page 2 of 9 1 2 34 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
superhyper is offline superhyper
2009-12-28 , 21:50
Posts: 57 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#11
I have indeed, my prior smartphone experiences are: Sidekick 2009, iphone 3GS, BB Bold (hated the Storm&Storm2), Palm Pre, Nokia E71,and the Motorola Droid

Originally Posted by OrangeBox View Post
Good for you. Have you tried other smartphones as well?
 
gerbick
2009-12-28 , 21:51
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#12
Glad to hear some good news.

But I'm curious... what parts did you like best? I'm still on the edge of pulling the trigger - gotta get more money first, Christmas killed my pockets - on the N900.
 
OrangeBox is offline OrangeBox
2009-12-28 , 21:55
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#13
The 3G and 3GS are two totally different beasts. It is only fair to do comparison between the 3GS and N900 (same cpus) and not the 3G and the N900 (different cpus). When mthob says that the N900 is 10x better than 3G it may be true but I can then say that 3GS is 10x better than N95.
 
Dave999's Avatar
Dave999 is offline Dave999
2009-12-28 , 21:59
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#14
plz stop comparing with iphone, x10 and other phones. Its ridicules because they are different phones. No phone is best so plz stop with this s**t in every thread.

I have both n900 and 3gs and i love my latest catch: N900.
 
gerbick
2009-12-28 , 21:59
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#15
Originally Posted by OrangeBox View Post
The 3G and 3GS are two totally different beasts. It is only fair to do comparison between the 3GS and N900 (same cpus) and not the 3G and the N900 (different cpus). When mthob says that the N900 is 10x better than 3G it may be true but I can then say that 3GS is 10x better than N95.
I think if you read correctly, there's been more than one person - myself included - that's used both the iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS. A small spike in the web browser due to a faster processor or in the 3D games isn't a "totally different beast" at all.

I do not think that it's that different. And yes, I've used both as well. It's a marginally different machine with very few perks in upgrading from the 3G to 3GS.

Wait... how in the hell did you take a conversation about the N900 and its positive points to your typical tirade about the iPhone!?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
mysticrokks is offline mysticrokks
2009-12-28 , 21:59
Posts: 589 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ london
#16
orangebox waht are you talking about..

how is the the n900 10 times better than the 3g..

and how is the 3gs 10 times better than the 3g

you are off your mind..

in specs they are not

and in terms of user experience- nothing really init bar slightly faster(3g to 3gs)

and both iphones are much more stable than the n900- and both do many jobs much better than the n900..

serioulsy i think you have no idea about these phones - its like you just read stuff and quote it- you obvioulsy havent used these phones extensivly at all..

(to add i do love my n900 10 times more than my 3g-- but i cant get rid of my iphone as it does to much so well when i am out and about)
Last edited by mysticrokks; 2009-12-28 at 22:05.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mysticrokks For This Useful Post:
OrangeBox is offline OrangeBox
2009-12-28 , 22:03
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#17
Originally Posted by superhyper View Post
I have indeed, my prior smartphone experiences are: Sidekick 2009, iphone 3GS, BB Bold (hated the Storm&Storm2), Palm Pre, Nokia E71,and the Motorola Droid
Did you try them out or use each one for at least a day? If yes, did the N900 save the day for you? For me, overall the 3GS and the N900 are the finalists. Both have different core strengths. For daily use the 3GS wins for sure, but for tinkering and trying out unstable stuff the N900 is the winner.
 
OrangeBox is offline OrangeBox
2009-12-28 , 22:07
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#18
Originally Posted by mysticrokks View Post
orangebox waht are you talking about..

how is the the n900 10 times better than the 3g..

and how is the 3gs 10 times better than the 3g

you are off your mind..

in specs they are not

and in terms of user experience- nothing really init bar slightly faster(3g to 3gs)

and both iphones are much more stable than the n900- and both do many jobs much better than the n900..

serioulsy i think you have no idea about these phones - its like you just read stuff and quote it- you obvioulsy havent used these phones extensivly at all..

(to add i do love my n900 10 times more than my 3g-- but i cant get rid of my iphone as it does to much so well when i am out and about)
Can you read or just moving your eyes?

MTHOB said that the N900 is 10x better than 3G.
Nobody said that the 3GS is 10x better than 3G.
 
OrangeBox is offline OrangeBox
2009-12-28 , 22:10
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#19
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Wait... how in the hell did you take a conversation about the N900 and its positive points to your typical tirade about the iPhone!?
It wasn't me. I threw 4 competitor phones out there and people knowing me started to jump all over the 3GS. Blame them.
 
mysticrokks is offline mysticrokks
2009-12-28 , 22:11
Posts: 589 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ london
#20
you compared the 3gs to the n900 , then you said that the n900 could be 10 times better than the 3g..

its as simple as that.

the 3g is almost exactly the same in terms of user experience to the the 3gs..

the ipones are stable phones that do much more very well, the n900 is a little computer, that has potential.
 
Reply
Page 2 of 9 1 2 34 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top