![]() |
2010-02-10
, 11:53
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-10
, 12:21
|
Posts: 286 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Cambridge, England
|
#13
|
I'm convinced Nokia wants mostly out of the OS business and is setting Symbian and Maemo up to compete against each other for the future, each with largely third-party development. I also think Maemo, being the more computer-based OS, has the ultimate advantage.
![]() |
2010-02-10
, 12:39
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ LDN
|
#14
|
![]() |
2010-02-10
, 12:54
|
Posts: 308 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ UK Swindon
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bonerp For This Useful Post: | ||
But in the long term, I think, Maemo will become very important for Nokia, as it is more ready for future challenges than Symbian is. Especially since Linux has a cool and state-of-the-art desktop while the kernel is rapidly becoming the de-facto industry standard for mobile devices (so you have good hardware support). Combining these two features is what sets Maemo ahead of its competitors.
I doubt that Nokia currently realizes the importance of Maemo as we still see (or it looks like this) Maemo Devices (and subcontractors) struggling alone with Maemo development.
Just my2 ¢
Tidings - RSS and Podcast aggregator for Jolla - https://github.com/pycage/tidings
Cargo Dock - file/cloud manager for Jolla - https://github.com/pycage/cargodock