Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 217 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#11
Originally Posted by acano View Post
8 disagree. personally N900 is the best phone of the market actually. Bur of course ther are still many things to do. Regards!
I know, the thing is that those missing things turn it into not the best phone out there, IMO.
 
Posts: 13 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Berlin
#12
Originally Posted by dhcmega View Post
On the other side, 600Mhz it is not enough as 256 of RAM either. This is no longer a pure cellphone OS, we are using a really multitasking linux!
My first Linux computer had 33MHz and 8MB RAM. Linux was runing fine, X was a little bit slow.
 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#13
dhcmega, I don't understand why you bought the phone if it doesn't serve your needs. You sound like an experienced user who knows what you want, so don't tell me you bought a quite expensive gadget without looking at the features? Lots of folks bought the N900 knowing exactly what they got, and they're happy campers because of that. That doesn't mean everyone will like it. If you want a polished, traditional phone it's not for you I think.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TA-t3 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 217 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#14
Originally Posted by Martin Holz View Post
My first Linux computer had 33MHz and 8MB RAM. Linux was runing fine, X was a little bit slow.
Try that linux and it will fly, but I guess that there are 15? years of coding and a bigger kernel in the middle! :P
 
Posts: 343 | Thanked: 819 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Paris, France
#15
I really do not understand people writing to complain and to say that they do not like it.... I usually do not post but i do not know how many of those kind of uninformative message have been posted.
Come on. Calm down. Have a look at the talk.maemo and you will see that your comparison of CPU vs nexus is not to be done the way you do. Then the phone functionality bah you should know that the n900 is not having those super phone functionality, full point. This has been said so many times.

With your sort of mentality, It is always better elsewhere. If you were having a nexus, you would still complain.
Enjoy what you have. Or go and whine somewhere else.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to P@t For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#16
Originally Posted by dhcmega View Post
I donīt think that they have used code for any other OS. IT is not a code issue, it is a common sense issue.
Me too that's why I asked it as rhetorical question.

Go read Bugzilla and Brainstorm and see that there is no common sense or well known "standards" here.

And yes it's just matter of coding it and implementing it properly.

Only thing right now you can do is stop conversation and do following:
- Vote, write bugzilla reports, brainstorm, vote, wait and learn ways to use it.
- Sell device and find something more appropriate to your needs and stop wasting your time with pondering wondering what might happen and what sucks.

Last edited by slender; 2010-02-12 at 15:19.
 
Posts: 217 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#17
Originally Posted by TA-t3 View Post
dhcmega, I don't understand why you bought the phone if it doesn't serve your needs. You sound like an experienced user who knows what you want, so don't tell me you bought a quite expensive gadget without looking at the features? Lots of folks bought the N900 knowing exactly what they got, and they're happy campers because of that. That doesn't mean everyone will like it. If you want a polished, traditional phone it's not for you I think.
Yes, you are right. The truth it that I asked a friend of mine that went to the US to investigate prices and stuff. When he came back, he surprised me with my new 653 dls N900 cell phone. It is really dificult to feel and experience a phone through forums though.

What I donīt like Nokia, in time where competition is tight, to release a phone that goes backwards in some aspects.

I know it could get to be a really good phone, but it is not there yet. Of course, IMO. And I donīt like Nokia delegating some features on coders good will.
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#18
the n900 is a great piece of kit just needs maturing and few missing features adding
 
Posts: 23 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#19
Originally Posted by dhcmega View Post
After years of great experiences with Nokia, I got an N97 and a N900. Sadly.

I was a really happy user of the Nokia 6600 and the excellent N95, among others. A few month ago I bought a N97, which was a really bad experience. Poorly GPS antenna, freezed screens, reboots, low memory issues, etc, etc, etc. Decent firmware took eons.
Now I have a N900. Other disappointment.

I found that the N900 is not a PC nor a Cellphone.
Why??
Beyond the camera, FlashPlayer 9.4, shell access, keyword (with some of the same problems that the N97 had), screen which is fine, the cell phone function is super poorly implemented. Come on, where is the experience from thousands of great telephones released before?? Are we going to start from scratch? No speed dial, no USSD, no favorites in contacts, no easy way to find contacts (I have 400) without opening the keyboard, screen has lag when ringing and turning, poorly SMS implentation, I mean, ok we have "conversations" at last, it was about time, but all the other features are gone (every heavy user will know what I am talking about). No MMS?? It is a joke. No possiblity to add APNs?? Amazing. A tiny rootfs partition, none sense.

On the other side, 600Mhz it is not enough as 256 of RAM either. This is no longer a pure cellphone OS, we are using a really multitasking linux! Google's phone has almost twice of both things. A terrible lack of apps (yet at least), Nokia is depending on free coders to implement basic cell phone features, ridiculous. Never expected from a big/serious company.

OVI Maps??? PC Suite?? Not fully implemented. How could this ever be??

I know that there is a lot of extras (mostly DEVEL) for solving many of those things, that IMO should Nokia took care of. No doubts at all.

So, the thing is that N900 or N97 with very last firmware, despite the hardware things, could be, or have the potential to be really good phones. N900 is not, yet.


dhcmega
I have to agree with you. It appears N95 was the latest decent Nokia device. It really, really makes me boil when I realize Nokia is outsourcing its beta-testing to paying customers like you and me. Never would have thought such from a company as big as Nokia.
 
Posts: 217 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#20
Originally Posted by P@t View Post
I really do not understand people writing to complain and to say that they do not like it.... I usually do not post but i do not know how many of those kind of uninformative message have been posted.
Come on. Calm down. Have a look at the talk.maemo and you will see that your comparison of CPU vs nexus is not to be done the way you do. Then the phone functionality bah you should know that the n900 is not having those super phone functionality, full point. This has been said so many times.

With your sort of mentality, It is always better elsewhere. If you were having a nexus, you would still complain.
Enjoy what you have. Or go and whine somewhere else.
Thats itīs your opinion. And mine is as good as yours.
 
Reply

Tags
it's not a phone!!!, nokia makes me sad, opinions


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40.