Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
RafaLL92's Avatar
Posts: 116 | Thanked: 77 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#11
Originally Posted by slender View Post
Did you boot with usb connected?
Nope, rebooted and then connected. I mean I have never had that problem before
 
Posts: 20 | Thanked: 9 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#12
Originally Posted by Enyibinakata View Post
I believe the lag is due to the massive swap file.
And I believe it's because of the moon phase and the sun spots!
 
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Switzerland
#13
Originally Posted by pagesix1536 View Post
This is disappointing. I just went to one of my company's main public-facing webservers which happens to have apache (known to spawn off lots of PIDs) and also MySQL running on it.
Web server number of PIDS: 104
My N900 at the moment: 164

Why is the N900 running so many apps/daemons/etc. More than a corporate webserver?
164? On my desktop, the highest PID after 50mins of surfing and some programming is 6700.
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#14
Originally Posted by RafaLL92 View Post
Nope, rebooted and then connected. I mean I have never had that problem before
I do not know what happened there but ain't no normal. And how about speed? is is more responsive?
 
Posts: 288 | Thanked: 196 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ London
#15
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
And I believe it's because of the moon phase and the sun spots!
Disk thrashing is no good for performance. The more you commit to swap, the harder the cpu has to work because it has to swap from disk to real memory hence the terrible lag. The RAM to Swap ratio of the N900 is a joke - 256 : 768.
 
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#16
Originally Posted by RafaLL92 View Post
I now have problem even with connecting the internal memory to the PC. It says its in use so it cant connect. And thats even freshly after reboot...
I had this problem a while back. It seems tracker was indexing in the background and was "using" the drive. After a few minutes I tried again and it worked. I blame tracker because top in an xterm showed it was consuming resources, and the phone was doing nearly nothing else.

I can understand stutter and delayed ring through when doing intensive stuff like movie playback. But MP3 playback shouldn't be as intense, and simple things like tracker shouldn't be able to make playback stutter. :P
 
RafaLL92's Avatar
Posts: 116 | Thanked: 77 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#17
Does rootfs free space affect the performance?
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#18
Originally Posted by RafaLL92 View Post
Does rootfs free space affect the performance?
Maybe. How much you have free space?

Btw. check in x terminal with command:
top
that there is no processes with high cpu and low io
 
RafaLL92's Avatar
Posts: 116 | Thanked: 77 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#19
88% used up with repositories enabled. Disabling them does not make any effect on performance (8% of rootfs space is freed though)
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#20
It should be enough. I would be worried if it drops below 10 mb.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to slender For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:59.