Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#11
read the original article, do not spread FUD further

please


background:

"replacing big and heavy cameras" was a joke thrown to the only photographer taking pictures in the SHOK summit.
http://cartinakuva.blogspot.com/2010...so-kamera.html
http://translate.google.com/translat...ml&sl=fi&tl=en
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search

Last edited by ossipena; 2010-04-22 at 06:42.
 
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ France
#12
Carl Zeiss optics are crap. OP doesn't know what SLR means. OP probably doesn't know what people spend more money on their glass than their body. Ignore the SLR part; phone cameras will still suck, no matter what.

Nath is right: you can't change the laws of physics when it comes to cameras.
 
Posts: 233 | Thanked: 170 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Finland
#13
Good comment at Engadget: "No, this would be someone saying that watching movies on the screen of a phone will make cinemas obsolete."

This is pretty much spot on, but on the other hand, this has been the case with camera phones for several years already. They have been good enough to replace SLR cameras for indiscriminate photographers for a long time already.
__________________
Read about my N900 experiences from my blog.
 
Posts: 233 | Thanked: 170 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Finland
#14
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
or then the most probable explanation: someone (khrm OP khrm) has misquoted something heavily?
I wasn't there to actually hear Vanjoki say anything, but according to other blogs he said to a photographer in the audience that "soon he wouldn't need to lug around all those lenses (and his DSLR) any longer, since Nokia camera phones would be good enough to replace them).

This does implicate that he meant the quality of photos produced by camera phones would be higher or as high as that produced with a DSLR in the near future(?). He didn't actually say when - I see now that the 12 months estimate was about HD video in camera phones and had nothing to do with the replacing of DSLRs.
__________________
Read about my N900 experiences from my blog.
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#15
Originally Posted by jaysire View Post
I wasn't there to actually hear Vanjoki say anything, but according to other blogs he said to a photographer in the audience that "soon he wouldn't need to lug around all those lenses (and his DSLR) any longer, since Nokia camera phones would be good enough to replace them).

This does implicate that he meant the quality of photos produced by camera phones would be higher or as high as that produced with a DSLR in the near future(?). He didn't actually say when - I see now that the 12 months estimate was about HD video in camera phones and had nothing to do with the replacing of DSLRs.
exactly.

OP please edit the topic because it is 110% incorrect.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
Posts: 126 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#16
Originally Posted by efekt View Post
Err... not really


The laws of physics are overrated...
yea not really literally

But for a common user slr, carl zeiss , HD blah blah at such tags would hardly matter, If the camera quality is better in resolution and with affordable/competitive price tag attached to it . Omnia HD thus leads the race (cheaper than n900, 8mpx).

A simple example is n70 , without any tags has much better camera clarity/resolution with just 2mpx when compared to nokia 5800 with so called carl zeiss lens at 3.2 mpx

Last edited by tusharmax; 2010-04-22 at 06:52.
 
Posts: 99 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#17
Ahh, this topic just made my day.

I'd imagine anyone else who takes photography seriously is joining me in laughing their arse off right now.

Cheers!
 
Posts: 126 | Thanked: 77 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ UK
#18
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
I see huge flaws with your references.

topic is incorrect. that has never been said except by you. get the facts

e: now I understand how all the FUD is given birth to.....
Hmmmm, aren't you a little judgemental this morning? Well I have just the thing to sort that out for you.
Read Me
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#19
Originally Posted by james174 View Post
Hmmmm, aren't you a little judgemental this morning? Well I have just the thing to sort that out for you.
Read Me
yes I am because that is old news and you are spreading FUD.
as stated above those claims have never been made by Vanjoki.

your article is btw crap.

1. it states that Vanjoki has been interviewed by reuters. false
source straight from the article:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLD...=Google+Reader

2. messing up things with title. Bit like "Meego is coming 2014" from sentences "Meego is coming 2010" + "Something will happend in 2014"
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search

Last edited by ossipena; 2010-04-22 at 07:04.
 
efekt's Avatar
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 320 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Israel
#20
I think this whole FUD was started by Engadget, which is basically a Nokia-haters blog...
Luckily they didn't misquote Vanjoki saying that "In 12 months Nokia will replace all those clumsy orbital telescopes with camera-phones"...
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38.