Reply
Thread Tools
joshua.maverick's Avatar
Posts: 805 | Thanked: 440 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Mississauga, On
#11
 
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#12
Festivalnut, any problems sampling the dsp output and encapsulating it into fixed format 'link' udp packets to send to the ijack? or excuse my lack of knowledge on the software on my own phone, perhaps grab the data before the dsp and recode to fixed codec?

multicodec support on the ijack module will make it expensive, I want it cheap.
 
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 537 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ scotland
#13
Originally Posted by zarf View Post
I gave up eventually, way too much commercial radio around here, bought a little box that pretends to be a cd autochanger to my in car cd player.

sort of how my thoughts got to, could I have this wireless with control of the media player via my car cd?

I can't see a reason why not either....
well the functionality for skip/reverse etc is already there in bluetooth, bluetooth dongles are tiny and ten a penny these days, so the trick is really making a box to convert bluetooth signals to ipod jack pin-outs (i think!)
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.

its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
 
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#14
Originally Posted by joshua.maverick View Post
Not a chance, ipod is way better.
Watch this space, you could have full Wireless ijack support

Phone apple up and ask when they'll be offering that one lol
 
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#15
But you're totally correct today. just maybe not in a few weeks time
 
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 537 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ scotland
#16
Originally Posted by zarf View Post
Festivalnut, any problems sampling the dsp output and encapsulating it into fixed format 'link' udp packets to send to the ijack? or excuse my lack of knowledge on the software on my own phone, perhaps grab the data before the dsp and recode to fixed codec?

multicodec support on the ijack module will make it expensive, I want it cheap.
lmao i'd already wrote my last reply before i read this, if i had read it first the reply would've been more like "uhhhh.... pass!"

sorry you're way outta my league now!

but the bluetooth box approach i still think is a definate winner, if you're using a bluetooth standards supporting box then the commercial viability is awesome! but something tells me apple will have something to say about it...
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.

its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
 
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#17
Before anyone mentions it, I know none of this exists yet, but overclocking a N900 was laughed at to start with, along with 'who would want to send sms text messages' when mobiles got invented lol
 

The Following User Says Thank You to zarf For This Useful Post:
xomm's Avatar
Posts: 609 | Thanked: 243 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Eastern USA
#18
Originally Posted by zarf View Post
i'm willing to sink money time and research to get a working prototype constructed.

Then who knows how we gets lots of them, worry about that later.....
I was thinking the same about wireless ethernet; for things like older gaming consoles or various Internet-enabled TVs, which obviously wouldn't work with traditional USB adapters.

Originally Posted by joshua.maverick
Not a chance, ipod is way better.
And that's some serious flame bait right there.
__________________
==In school once again. Free time limited to night, holidays and weekends.==
Hi! I'm Andy, a Maemo Greeter! I'm also a moderator of the Applications, Nokia N900, and Maemo 5/Fremantle forums.
Useful Links: Maemo Wiki Main Page, New users start here, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Also, pin yourself in the map! Maemo Map. Send me a PM (Private Message) if I leave you hanging on a problem (or if you need more help).
Owner of both a N800 and N900; Active community member since Jan 2010. You've been xommified! - My blog.
 
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#19
Not if I don't turn it into a commercial product, doubt they can say a word if I publish the design and build details on a website for free public domain access



I could sue them I suppose if they used the idea to create a commercial product lol. But being serious I just want one, I want the software to drive it in the repositories and the hardware details as public knowledge.

Mods, please advise if you think I'm treading on dangerous ground. I think GPL comes into play but I'm not a lawyer
 
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 113 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#20
simple answer is no
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40.