bsving
|
2010-10-11
, 22:49
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#11
|
|
2010-10-11
, 22:51
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#12
|
Sure, like the iPhone with its whopping 1% market share. I think someone said that connecting people is what really matters, and technology doesn't matter - not really, it's what you do with it. I don't remember who exactly, but I think it is one of the top sellers with 40% market share
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-11
, 22:57
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#13
|
|
2010-10-11
, 22:59
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#14
|
|
2010-10-11
, 23:19
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#15
|
|
2010-10-11
, 23:40
|
Posts: 874 |
Thanked: 316 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ London UK
|
#16
|
|
2010-10-11
, 23:54
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#17
|
Nokia is much more than the N900. The N900 wasn't even meant to "connect people", but was the first mobile computer and a geek device for hackers.
Because we all know that great hardware specs is the key to gaining large market/mindshare and customers satisfaction?
But it is not important anyway.
What's important (hardly but somewhat) is that it's obvious that Windows Mobile 7 will be a flop, competing head on with google, bada and Symbian^3/4.
It will probably sell some in the US market, but that is just about all. I had the impression that it was more business oriented, but it is not, it is meant for the general public and is dead boring and locked down.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-12
, 02:24
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#18
|
Microsoft seems to be doing the "We can do Apple things too" type of stuff... let's see how that fares for them. While we're waiting... let's see how MeeGo does too.
Wide open doesn't seem to sell all that well either. OpenMoko, Maemo... hmm.
|
2010-10-12
, 02:33
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
Wide open is, as a whole, irrelevant. You can be totally wide open, however, and still have a good user experience. And really, that's all I ask. Certainly, Apple and Microsoft are hard at work fighting against that.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-12
, 02:58
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#20
|
I said absolutely nothing about user experience.
I said "wide open doesn't sell well" - it just hasn't on handhelds yet. I find the user experience on open systems - while sometimes maddening - better in a lot of instances albeit varied in some cases unnecessarily.
The UX on the WP7 is honestly looking to be quite good. That and a tie-in into the ever popular XBOX Live platform. That might sell a lot of units alone.
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bestthreadever, fanboys unite, loser tech |
|