![]() |
2007-07-09
, 05:30
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#12
|
![]() |
2007-07-09
, 07:44
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#13
|
I tried patching kernel in my 770. I have a 1 GB Kingston MMC. I had booted from there and thought that I would patch kernel in MMC.
I inserted my older sandisk 512 and was able to boot from flash and read from 512 MMC. I changed card to 1GB but was not able to read it, not even after reformatting to vfat. My question here is that should my newer 1GB card be able to work with patched kernel? My several months older 512 did? If it should work and I could take it back, how can I prove the seller that the card is faulty as it works well at lower frequencies?
Furthermore is it possible to patch the kernel located in MMC when I have booted from MMC, a modified script or something?
![]() |
2007-07-09
, 09:51
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#14
|
![]() |
2007-07-09
, 10:31
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#15
|
I had the impression that all was booted from mmc but that obviously is not possible![]()
![]() |
2007-07-09
, 11:02
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#16
|
Hmm, looks like kernel hangs even before running userspace stuff. That's odd. What happens if you boot from flash with patched kernel and then insert the 1GB card after system is up and running? Does it work (i.e card is accessible)? Are there some errors in kernel log when card is detected? Or when it is being read later (try to run 'find /media/mmc1' to scan card file structure)? To see kernel log you can run 'dmesg' in osso-xterm after you insert the card and close door. Or you can leave 'cat /proc/kmsg' running as root and experiment with the card.
![]() |
2007-07-11
, 06:04
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#17
|
![]() |
2007-07-11
, 08:19
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#18
|
![]() |
2007-07-11
, 08:28
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#19
|
![]() |
2007-07-11
, 08:56
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#20
|
Fast or slow shouldn't make a difference, as its the number of read/write cycles that counts. High speed will stress the card more though, so lf there is a manufacturing defect, it could break sooner in high speed.