Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 18 hrs, 16 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 14 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 4 days, 3 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 17 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-02
, 19:01
|
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Norris
No need to wait. Go and test WP7 phone in a shop or read Mango reviews, like this one from Arstechnica. http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/rev...o-reviewed.ars.
Will be nice to se what they come up with.
Imagine Nokia logo to one of those pictures and you have the first Nokia WP7 phone. Specs will be identical or nearly identical and user experience exactly the same.
Last edited by Rauha; 2011-10-02 at 19:10.
|
|
2011-10-02
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 35 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by misterc
ppl are tired of having that kind of crap on their computers, they are not going to fall for it any more
Yes that is exactly my opinion regarding Open Office / Libre Office...
 |
|
2011-10-02
, 19:11
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#14
|
why isn't m@ke$$h!t offering m$-off on Linux/GNU, if it is that good?
not even on Mac any more, if memory serves well
¦-)))))
not even on Mac any more, if memory serves well
¦-)))))
|
|
2011-10-02
, 19:30
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by misterc
Your memory has failed you. Microsoft Office is on Mac as well. It's IE and Windows Media Player that's no longer offered on the Mac.
why isn't m@ke$$h!t offering m$-off on Linux/GNU, if it is that good?
not even on Mac any more, if memory serves well
¦-)))))
And next time, please spell the damn things out. I absolutely hate reading those kinds of posts and having to decipher what the hell people mean. M$ - is this slashdot now!?
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-10-02
, 19:38
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
how much is the fruit company (... you know who i'm talking about, right?) paying for the port?
Your memory has failed you. Microsoft Office is on Mac as well. It's IE and Windows Media Player that's no longer offered on the Mac.[...]
and still, the user has to pay on top of that ¦-)))))))
200% sure, it's not, repeat not, available on Linux/GNU...
how comes?
|
|
2011-10-02
, 19:46
|
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by misterc
Apple doesn't pay anything for the port. Microsoft has profitable Mac Business Unit. Btw, it's actually easier and takes less keystrokes to write Apple than to write fruit company.
how much is the fruit company (... you know who i'm talking about, right?) paying for the port?
and still, the user has to pay on top of that ¦-)))))))
Originally Posted by misterc
Maybe because Linux on desktop has <1% marketshare and it's pretty much non-existent in office work space?
200% sure, it's not, repeat not, available on Linux/GNU...
how comes?
Last edited by Rauha; 2011-10-02 at 19:54.
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-10-02
, 19:57
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by misterc
Microsoft, stock symbol MSFT, has a BU, a business unit set aside only for Mac products and development. Apple, stock symbol AAPL, does not pay for Microsoft Office; the application suite you erroneously assumed was no longer around previously.
how much is the fruit company (... you know who i'm talking about, right?) paying for the port?
and still, the user has to pay on top of that
And yes, like most software on OS X and Windows, you do have to pay for it. Here you go.
200% sure, it's not, repeat not, available on Linux/GNU...
how comes?
Hint over. Toodles.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-10-02
, 20:04
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Norris
Former MCSE/MCDBA - can't say I'm a Windows lover, but I'm a frequent Windows user and hell... they paid the bills for over a decade.
I'm sure we don't have any windows lovers here
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
| Tags |
| idle banter, misterdork, misteridiot, mr.cuckoo, mrsdada |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.
more desperate then anything else
it's about the fact that i can manage my device & install & remove whatever i want whenever i want.
and it works
m@ke$$h!t' $h!t simply doesn't work
period.
ppl are tired of having that kind of crap on their computers, they are not going to fall for it any more, certainly not if they have (better) free alternatives. well, one, @ least...
thus the patent war, buying of Motorola mobile et cetera et cetera et cetera...
PLUS: when is the last time you paid for an app you installed on your N900?