The Following User Says Thank You to abyzthomas For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-03-01
, 20:21
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#12
|
|
2012-03-01
, 21:16
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
@ Sacramento, CA USA
|
#13
|
|
2012-03-01
, 21:18
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
@ Sacramento, CA USA
|
#14
|
|
2012-03-01
, 21:19
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#15
|
|
2012-03-01
, 21:21
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
@ Sacramento, CA USA
|
#16
|
I had the same bad .list in the repos but I didnt do the "apt-get upgrade". I would be careful with "apt-get upgrade" since that actually changes your system.
|
2012-03-01
, 21:30
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#17
|
|
2012-03-01
, 21:44
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
@ Sacramento, CA USA
|
#18
|
dist-upgrade is closer to "you probably shouldnt be doing that" upgrade can break things too (but shouldnt) since you are changing the software installed on your system even if you dont need to. Just a warning.
|
2012-03-01
, 21:56
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
So...I was able to update...but when trying to upgrade
~ # apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgpg-error0 libpixman-1-0
The following packages will be upgraded:
nano
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and2 not upgraded.
Need to get 580kB of archives.
After this operation, 106kB of additional diskspace will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
nano
Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y
Get:1 http://repo.pub.meego.com ./ nano 2.2.6-1 [580kB]
Fetched 580kB in 21s (27.1kB/s)
Aegis rejecting /var/cache/apt/archives/nano_2.2.6-1_armel.deb: package 'nano' already installed from 'com.nokia.maemo' -- not replacing it from unknown origin
aegis aborting dpkg -- all listed package files rejected
Compilation failed in require.
Updating desktop entries... Done
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an errorcode (255)
~ #
If nano was already installed and up-to-date, why did it detect a upgrade..?
|
2012-03-01
, 22:00
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#20
|
You may be right, for I'm no expert...but when I was waiting for PR1.2 OTA upgrade (before it was available on NaviFirm)
I went to Settings>Applications> Manage Applications> Update and had a bunch of stuff there to update (Store, Link) but no PR1.2
so when I ran command ap-get upgrade it installed all the ones that were in my Update screen.....
So I'm wondering if thats all it ever does, is upgrade installed apps
I am having the same problem since 1.2 and I opened a new bug
https://harmattan-bugs.nokia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056
Please vote/report your findings. This we need a work around or fix as soon as possible.