Page 2 of 8 1 2 34 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
GrimyHR is offline GrimyHR
2012-03-18 , 10:47
Posts: 470 | Thanked: 399 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ Croatia
#11
nokia e6 has "retina" display(325ppi)
so stop lieing that nokia does not have an cancer curing life saving coffee making unbelieveably amazing retina display(not that retina display is actualy great, but some people obviously fap and come on everything apple presents them...)
suck on that
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to GrimyHR For This Useful Post:
rash.m2k is offline rash.m2k
2012-03-18 , 11:29
Posts: 642 | Thanked: 486 times | Joined on Aug 2008
#12
Because I have seen the iPad 3 in the flesh and compared it to my Nokia N9 and my galaxy tab.

Retina display is a load of bollocks to keep the minds of the fanbois occupied.

I'd rather had a slightly better screen resolution - but SUPER AMOLED+ with clear black!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to rash.m2k For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
benny1967 is offline benny1967
2012-03-18 , 11:30
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#13
Originally Posted by GrimyHR View Post
nokia e6 has "retina" display(325ppi)
so stop lieing that nokia does not have an cancer curing life saving coffee making unbelieveably amazing retina display(not that retina display is actualy great, but some people obviously fap and come on everything apple presents them...)
LOL

LOLing again for 10+
 
Lumiaman
2012-03-18 , 14:03
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#14
i have to disagree. The retina display is way sharper than N9 display. See the link above on microscope based agreement of.pixels. Amoled pentile screens are horrible
 
Soppa's Avatar
Soppa is offline Soppa
2012-03-18 , 14:10
Posts: 115 | Thanked: 116 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Helsinki
#15
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
i have to disagree. The retina display is way sharper than N9 display. See the link above on microscope based agreement of.pixels. Amoled pentile screens are horrible
You're funnier than your nick!

Surely you must've registered here just for trollin'. But that's kind of sad.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Soppa For This Useful Post:
Estel's Avatar
Estel is offline Estel
2012-03-18 , 14:10
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#16
lmao. We're talking about actual perceived quality, not the "microscope value", yep? It's amazing, how much bulls**t can be pushed in some people's mind by just simple marketing operation.

I would trade this for amoled everyday, if I could get rid of the damn useless capacitive touchm that is usually bundled with it.

/Estel

// Edit

And please, don't post such crap in N900 section.
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
MINKIN2 is offline MINKIN2
2012-03-18 , 14:26
Posts: 1,326 | Thanked: 1,524 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#17
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
i have to disagree. The retina display is way sharper than N9 display. See the link above on microscope based agreement of.pixels. Amoled pentile screens are horrible
It will look sharper because of the higher pixel per inch ratio. There is no magic behind the Retina display, they just use that term as a marketing gimmick instead of saying "our pixel density is high enough so you won't see any pixels at the optimal viewing distance of an arms length"

And that's the point of it. You can have a 10 foot tall billboard with a display of 1080p, yes when you are stood next to it you will see every pixel but when it is mounted on its pole ten foot in the air, you will be stood at it optimal viewing distance and not see the pixels. Same goes for your lonely old SDTV.


That said though, the idevices do have crisp screens and it did make me wonder why Nokia decided to put such a low res screen on the 808 when it is taking such amazing photos. Could the not have stretched to 800x480 at least?

>And why is this in the N900 board? Can the mods please move this
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MINKIN2 For This Useful Post:
GrimyHR is offline GrimyHR
2012-03-18 , 14:36
Posts: 470 | Thanked: 399 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ Croatia
#18
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
i have to disagree. The retina display is way sharper than N9 display. See the link above on microscope based agreement of.pixels. Amoled pentile screens are horrible
im sure you use your mobile phone with microscope but the rest of us(that means normal people) use our phones 30-50cm from our head with maybe prescription glasses for those of us with sight problems...
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GrimyHR For This Useful Post:
snowparang is offline snowparang
2012-03-18 , 14:44
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Dec 2011
#19
Originally Posted by MINKIN2 View Post
That said though, the idevices do have crisp screens and it did make me wonder why Nokia decided to put such a low res screen on the 808 when it is taking such amazing photos. Could the not have stretched to 800x480 at least?
Limitations of the Symbian OS?
 
panjgoori's Avatar
panjgoori is offline panjgoori
2012-03-18 , 15:10
Posts: 1,239 | Thanked: 1,278 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Balochistan
#20
but still 808's screen is great. with such low resolution for a 4 inch screen.
 
Reply
Page 2 of 8 1 2 34 Last »

Tags
godwin’s law, pentile, screen res

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:07.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top