The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to X-Fade For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-04
, 14:48
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ivgalvez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-04
, 14:51
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 732 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Finland
|
#13
|
|
2012-04-04
, 14:59
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 620 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#14
|
There is also a problem to promote packages depending on libsdl-ttf2.0-0.
Do someone knows what is the status of that problem? Can that prohibition be revoked?
|
2012-04-04
, 14:59
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#15
|
|
2012-04-04
, 15:00
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#16
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ivgalvez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-04
, 15:49
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#17
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-04
, 15:53
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#18
|
Afaik that was added because it broke something in some PR release. But I really can't find what it was about anymore. If it works with PR1.3 or CSSU, I guess it can be removed.
|
2012-04-04
, 15:57
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#19
|
Consider that if the original maintainer had already promoted the application to Testing, it's because he considered it suitable for promotion, so there is no point in requiring another manual step.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-04
, 15:59
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#20
|
I remember this well. It was bug 10450.
I will _never_ understand why it was refused to fix the wrongly-named binary SDK package.
This can be fixed for SSU, but I do not think anyone has done it yet.
I do not know what has happened since that bug. If the crappy-dev-package is still on the SDK repo, it should get pulled before the Debian repackaged one (because "osso" > "maemo"), and therefore the built package should dep on libsdl-ttf2.0 (no -0), avoiding the blockage. So no idea why it deps on -0 atm.
If there is consensus about doing automatic promotion on unlock, then I can add that to the code.
http://maemo.org/profile/view/xfade/ - maemo.org webmaster Apps.formeego.org (Apps for N9)