Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 7 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Feb 2013
#11
Thanks. And... Is there any advantage of using FAT then? Or to ask that way, why can be no permission allowed desirable??

Last edited by Holy bible; 2013-02-23 at 15:11.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Holy bible For This Useful Post:
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 509 times | Joined on Nov 2011 @ Canada
#12
The advatange of MyDocs being FAT, is that you can plug your n900 into your computer via USB and read the partition on Windows.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shawnjefferson For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#13
..so in short one can say the usage of FAT is for compatibility and historic reasons, not because it's a good choice. There are other portable & matured filesystems which are robust but a) could not be extorted by patents and b) have to be included in vanilla Windows. (btw: can we say "Window", now that Win 8 jumped on the full-screen apps train too? Or "Fensterl 8" in .AT)
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to don_falcone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 7 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Feb 2013
#14
Originally Posted by shawnjefferson View Post
The advatange of MyDocs being FAT, is that you can plug your n900 into your computer via USB and read the partition on Windows.
yeah but what about NTFS. it's also readable by windows and it's newer. why not this format for example???

P.S.: sorry to be annoying for someone maybe, but i just want to have it clear in my mind
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Holy bible For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,048 | Thanked: 1,127 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Amsterdam
#15
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to anthonie For This Useful Post:
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 509 times | Joined on Nov 2011 @ Canada
#16
Originally Posted by Holy bible View Post
yeah but what about NTFS. it's also readable by windows and it's newer. why not this format for example???

P.S.: sorry to be annoying for someone maybe, but i just want to have it clear in my mind
Probably for many reasons, but I imagine mainly for compatibility reasons first off. If you have ever noticed that almost all USB memory sticks are formated in either FAT or FAT32, depending on their size.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shawnjefferson For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,808 | Thanked: 4,272 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany
#17
Originally Posted by Holy bible View Post
yeah but what about NTFS. it's also readable by windows and it's newer. why not this format for example???
NTFS is R/W under Windows (but not 95 or 98). Plus there are different "revisions" (or versions) of NTFS, so some NTFS features used by Windows Vista (or 7) will not be usable under Windows XP or 2000 or NT, etc.

Plus, Linux generally only supports reading from NTFS, but not writing. Yes, there are drivers allowing writing, but it's not 100% reliable (I guess they emulate Windows just a bit too much .

Plus, you want a USB stick (and MyDocs is just that) to work with all sorts of exotic devices, such as a TV, or an Android phone, or whatever, which probably only supports FAT32.

Plus, MyDocs/USB-stick are supposed to be used for exchanging data. Meaning you don't want any sort of file/directory permissions to ruin that "experience". This is, IMHO, the single most reasonable reason why VFAT/FAT32 is still so widespread.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post:
Posts: 7 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Feb 2013
#18
Originally Posted by reinob View Post
NTFS is R/W under Windows (but not 95 or 98). Plus there are different "revisions" (or versions) of NTFS, so some NTFS features used by Windows Vista (or 7) will not be usable under Windows XP or 2000 or NT, etc.

Plus, Linux generally only supports reading from NTFS, but not writing. Yes, there are drivers allowing writing, but it's not 100% reliable (I guess they emulate Windows just a bit too much .

Plus, you want a USB stick (and MyDocs is just that) to work with all sorts of exotic devices, such as a TV, or an Android phone, or whatever, which probably only supports FAT32.

Plus, MyDocs/USB-stick are supposed to be used for exchanging data. Meaning you don't want any sort of file/directory permissions to ruin that "experience". This is, IMHO, the single most reasonable reason why VFAT/FAT32 is still so widespread.
Thanks!! Very useful and fulfilling on my question thanks once more
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Holy bible For This Useful Post:
Posts: 839 | Thanked: 3,386 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#19
One correction. Files from FAT-filesystem can be executed (in general). If you check /etc/fstab on N900, you can see a row:
/dev/mmcblk0p1 /home/user/MyDocs vfat noauto,nodev,noexec,nosuid,noatime,nodiratime,utf8,uid=29999,shortnam e=mixed,dmask=000,fmask=0133,rodir 0
I bolded one parameter to focus.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AapoRantalainen For This Useful Post:
Posts: 31 | Thanked: 31 times | Joined on Jan 2013 @ USA
#20
Also getting rid of the "noexec," you should change the fmask to 0000 so all files with have the +x bit set.

Just don't accidentally run a text file as they too will be +x.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to eccerr0r For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04.