|
2015-09-28
, 08:50
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 09:03
|
|
Posts: 1,974 |
Thanked: 1,834 times |
Joined on Mar 2013
@ india
|
#13
|
|
2015-09-28
, 09:34
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#14
|
That might be tricky. MicroB does not load in the background. That's my only gripe with it.
The Following User Says Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 09:48
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 11:06
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 106 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Hungary
|
#16
|
The video shows a fast UI, not necessarily a fast N900 system.
Basically he is not trying to stretch its limits where swap will become a real issue.
The Following User Says Thank You to dy1ng For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 13:51
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#17
|
When N900 was released, everybody told that she is a fully multitasking beast, and that is partially true, but with serious limits...
I don't know whose idea was that this device has to live with 256 MB ram...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 15:43
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 106 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Hungary
|
#18
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dy1ng For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-09-28
, 18:46
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 106 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Hungary
|
#19
|
CPU's up_treshold and sampling rate
a little more information on this please
|
2015-09-29
, 05:06
|
|
Posts: 1,974 |
Thanked: 1,834 times |
Joined on Mar 2013
@ india
|
#20
|
Those are basic CPU parameters in Linux, and we can adjust them (among others) through kernel-power-settings in N900's with Kernel Power.
Google them, if you curios more about them.
Sample rate speaks for itself, up treshold regulates that when is neccessary to set the next higher CPU clock.
I have it in 25, so 25% of CPU load is enough for it to set itself from 500 to 1000MHz.
I haven't noticed any affects on battery life, so I'm using it only with this two freqs allowed.
The video shows a fast UI, not necessarily a fast N900 system.
Basically he is not trying to stretch its limits where swap will become a real issue.
We all want to improve the N900 response time when we are truly multitasking.
Waiting for webpages to load is not an indication of professional N900 usage .
You should open a few and let them load in the background while doing other stuff, launching more programs.
He should be demonstrating all those actions with Skype and other IM logged in, LibreOffice loading in the background through easy Debian, FLAC music playing in the background, all standard productivity applications opened while receiving an incoming phone call.
Then we will see how smooth and fast the alleged tweaked system really is.
Regardless, we will all agree that the N900 is the device to make and get things done, even if it isn't the fastest.
It is possible to make a video that will make the N900 look way more powerful than the Jolla with current OOM policy that equally prefers to offer a smooth interface over full multitasking.
Leaving things like auto rotate enabled is asking for extra delays. Just turn it off and live with landscape will already improve the experience.
What other parameters should I check?
I forgot since I last setup one but I am pretty pleased with the performance, understanding the system's limits.