The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:38
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
@ India
|
#2002
|
The Following User Says Thank You to knobby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:46
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
@ India
|
#2004
|
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:48
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#2005
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:48
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#2006
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:50
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#2007
|
"Common sense" still tells me, that it's better to finish task on 500 mhz, and sit on 0 mhz (saving on power leakage), than doing it longer on 125 mhz, even extra-low-voltaged. but, I may miss something, that's why I'm asking.
/Estel
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gusse For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 19:52
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#2008
|
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 20:21
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
@ India
|
#2009
|
The Following User Says Thank You to knobby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 20:24
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#2010
|
I thought also same way, but long term testing has shown that 125M & 500M profile is better that single 500M. Most of the prosessing time is on 125M (~75%) and 500M (~25%).
Use case: night time, phone not in use at all.
![]() |
Tags |
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou |
|
Only one small question remain - do you think that - with new values - current idea of "race-to-idle" (i.e, that limits 500-900, are more power-efficient that 250-900 or 1250-900, due to device finishing tasks faster on 500-900, and setting on 0 for more time), are outdated with new Sr, i.e 125-900 is now more power-efficient (or will be, after finalizing SR vdd2 also)? "Common sense" still tells me, that it's better to finish task on 500 mhz, and sit on 0 mhz (saving on power leakage), than doing it longer on 125 mhz, even extra-low-voltaged. but, I may miss something, that's why I'm asking.
/Estel
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!