![]() |
2009-10-21
, 00:39
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#202
|
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 13:53
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#203
|
... lower service cost for unlocked phones (the 'Get More Plus' deal) and a little extra for 3G data service. Getting an unlocked N900 looks like a good move.
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 14:02
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#204
|
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 14:10
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#205
|
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 14:29
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#206
|
What if they do sell the phones (and the N900) over at T-Mobile but at higher prices than most retailers.
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 14:37
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Somerville MA - USA
|
#207
|
rather than the type of phone i suspect it would be based on whether you got a subsidy on the phone or payed in full/brought your own
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 14:51
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Somerville MA - USA
|
#208
|
This is good news - but I am a bit sceptical here.
What if they do sell the phones (and the N900) over at T-Mobile but at higher prices than most retailers. Then what is the benefit of buying from T-mobile where I actually have to pay more than market prevailing prices just to get a monthly plan ?
If they can price match at leats most retailers and have it on par prices than that makes sence. But if they have already added a premium of 20% on the price and then offer a monthly plan buying plan - that is a bit of a downer for me.
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 15:00
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Somerville MA - USA
|
#209
|
Very good!
I too think this last bit^ will be the case and may very well be the game changer they speak of.
We may have seen in the past how a balance of things like "Churn rate", "ARPU", and handset introduction and customer upgrade schedules could put pressure on US carriers to maintain the status quo regarding “locked in”contactscontracts and early termination fees. Any carrier, the thinking went, that broke with this status quo would eventually gain the most from attrition provided their service satisfied the coverage needs of new customers. However, others reasoned that such a carrier would experience significantly reduced revenue until the right combination of handsets were available and enough potential customers were "out of contract" with other carriers.
Perhaps because of some of the conditions you remark about earlier in your post, T-Mo has found itself in a position financially to ride out established upgrade schedules and reap the future pay-off of increased market share.
![]() |
2009-10-21
, 15:12
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#210
|
We may have seen in the past how a balance of things like "Churn rate", "ARPU", and handset introduction and customer upgrade schedules could put pressure on US carriers to maintain the status quo regarding “locked in”
contactscontracts and early termination fees. Any carrier, the thinking went, that broke with this status quo would eventually gain the most from attrition provided their service satisfied the coverage needs of new customers. However, others reasoned that such a carrier would experience significantly reduced revenue until the right combination of handsets were available and enough potential customers were "out of contract" with other carriers.Perhaps because of some of the conditions you remark about earlier in your post, T-Mo has found itself in a position financially to ride out established upgrade schedules and reap the future pay-off of increased market share.
Last edited by YoDude; 2009-10-21 at 14:04. Reason: contracts for contacts