Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 255 | Thanked: 109 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#2091
Originally Posted by CarstenDutch View Post
Did anybody replaced his firmware with the Letho's 1100mhz and the 1000mhz they are the same if you ask me.

I tried both and did the echo 1000000...etc i got 1100mhz seen in Conky and Healthcheck normaly locked at 800mhz on 500mhz stock voltage.

Can Letho confirm this?
im running the 800 (1000) ulv
after "unlocking" 1Ghz conky reported correct!
 
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#2092
Originally Posted by CarstenDutch View Post
Did anybody replaced his firmware with the Letho's 1100mhz and the 1000mhz they are the same if you ask me.

I tried both and did the echo 1000000...etc i got 1100mhz seen in Conky and Healthcheck normaly locked at 800mhz on 500mhz stock voltage.

Can Letho confirm this?
CarstenDutch, this has been solved some pages before in this thread
Just re-download it because the first kernel he did put in his site was 1100 not 1000 max freq.
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis

 
CarstenDutch's Avatar
Posts: 147 | Thanked: 78 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Netherlands
#2093
Originally Posted by debernardis View Post
CarstenDutch, this has been solved some pages before in this thread
Just re-download it because the first kernel he did put in his site was 1100 not 1000 max freq.
Yes i was smart enough too do that before you told me about it, it's still the same

Edit: I did not change any config files
 
matts76's Avatar
Posts: 324 | Thanked: 201 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ UK
#2094
Ive been running the fiasco 125-900mhz kernal for 4 days now rock solid and no problems at all, except for battery life, i am unable to run flasher 3.5 so was wondering if there is a fiasco ulv kernal yet, i appologise if this has already been asked but ive been fillowing this thread from the start and havent seen it.

I would also like to thank Lehto, Titan, & Matan for their amazing work.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to matts76 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 255 | Thanked: 109 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#2095
Originally Posted by CarstenDutch View Post
Yes i was smart enough too do that before you told me about it, it's still the same

Edit: I did not change any config files
the one i got last night is fine.
pm me yer email and i will sent it you.
 
Posts: 202 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ CZE
#2096
Interrogative - Why you dont use 125mHz frequency anymore?
__________________
"I'm a Nokia fan. Ericsson ruled, Sony Ericsson SUX!!!"
Titans kernel up-and-running, N900 PR1.2 @ XLV 250-900 (Overclocking Guide)
 
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#2097
I'm testing zImage-800mhz-ulv-1000mhz + fast freq switch(150ms-75%), work very very good!!
Unlock 1000mhz and phone is fast and stable

Sometime system reset max freq to 600'000

1100mhz @ stock 600mhz voltage is very danger and unsafe if phone is stable?
 
pantera1989's Avatar
Posts: 577 | Thanked: 699 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Malta
#2098
Hi could someone please recommend a stable 800mhz or 900mhz overclock setup? With links please. I would prefer if they were with reduced voltage to help with battery life.

About the ULV setup. ULV helps you maximize speed while keeping voltages in check. So that the CPU won't receive a higher voltage than decided.

But won't for example running 600mhz with 3.5v with a ULV setup instead 600mhz with 5v (stock kernel) be more stressful? So won't running 900mhz with 5v be stressful too?
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Switzerland
#2099
I am using titan -maemo20 kernel (the standard one not LV/ULV) and i tryed various OC config, scaling up 50mhz each time from 700 till 1ghz which all worked fine (didnt try go above 1ghz cause I felt scared).

Then I started check dmesg regularly and I run into this bug:
WARNING: at /home/builder2/maemo-fremantle-armel-extras-devel/work/kernel-maemo-2.6.28/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c:443 omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate+0x28c/0x2dc()

I noticed this bug occurs starting from any setting above 750ghz (last working without the mentioned dmesg)

My question is are others getting same behaviour when setting the OC anything above 750ghz or you guys start run into it from diff OC setting, I am wondering if its a general limit that happens to all or it change from hw to hw and some get it at 750, 800, 850?

Could anyone check if the above limit occurs with LV and ULV kernel aswell and if yes from which ***ghz setting it start to occurs?

Last edited by Jokah; 2010-04-10 at 12:59.
 
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#2100
Originally Posted by Jokah View Post
My question is are others getting same behaviour when setting the OC anything above 750ghz or you guys start run into it from diff OC setting, I am wondering if its a general limit that happens to all or it change from hw to hw and some get it at 750, 800, 850?

Could anyone check if the above limit occurs with LV and ULV kernel aswell and if yes from which ***ghz setting it start to occurs?
I have the same with titan's maemo19 kernel, so I'm using my phone at 750MHz just to be on the safe side. I'll switch to a LV or ULV kernel soon and see how that one works out.

By the way I've used my phone at frequencies up to 900MHz, and all seemed well except for dmesg warnings...
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:40.