![]() |
2009-08-14
, 23:07
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#212
|
That 'enormous' aftermarket 'market' that you talked about.. it's possible from the combination of huge userbase, lock in mechanism (proprietary connectors, enabler chips, etc), revenue sharing mechanism, powerful brand & marketing, etc.
Not to mention, there's a big financial incentive for them to do well in that area.
If I had a definite answer to this, I would be making lots of money right now. But, as things stand, there is a huge number of possible reasons to choose from, not all of them under Nokia's control, and choosing/eliminating the right ones is a million dollar question.
ROFL, what's wrong with making comparison with what's available in the market? For technical or practical reasons: they're in similar price range, occupy the same market space, technically comparable (well somewhat, the pre and iphone has stepped off with cortex a8), designed to do similar tasks..
When one is in the market for such device, those are the options. So what's the most natural thing to do? Compare.
Btw, can you give me a list of sites that's supposed to crash the these non-desktop browsers? I've the HTC G1 and iPhone 3GS to test. I've yet to see either of them crash opening a web page.
The most natural thing to do is to buy a device you like, then shut up. If you've accidentally bought a device you do not like, sell it, then go to step #1.
Exactly: I have got the device I like and shut up. You do not see me endlessly bitсhing about devices I own, do you?
Last I checked, the life of a BMW and a Toyota is much longer than the less than 2 years that each NIT has enjoyed in the name of "support"
My last BMW lasted 8 years, and in high school to college, my Toyota lasted 9.
Regardless, these are disposable items, especially where firmware updates are basicaly stopped the moment a newer version/iteration of said product comes out. This comparison to paying more for a telephone or NIT in the name of "better quality" but yet it lacks continued support and/or seems already dated from the moment you purchase it is the wrong analogy.
Paying a premium for something that does not get regular support in the way of the rest of the Nokia products is a foolish endeavor no matter how you split it.
And these numbers being tossed around... which models represent this growth?
I still stand by my notion that the mindshare for Nokia is lessening. We've already seen it happen to Motorola. And Apple/RIM has nothing to do with that; they're just competition.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net