![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:20
|
|
Posts: 405 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London, UK
|
#212
|
1. Not leaked, published. And, rolled out accidentially, causing half-updates for poor pple who did pkcon update in terminal.
The Following User Says Thank You to vitaminj For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:30
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 4,322 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#213
|
But according to the TJC thread, only if you have ssu release set to "latest", whereas using my massive sample size of 1 (me), people who've only ever done official updates have this set to the update they're on (i.e. "1.1.2.16") so won't get an update.
Am I right? Is this only going out to people who've used this same trick before?
The Following User Says Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:30
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#214
|
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:36
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 4,322 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#215
|
What? Rollin out software by mistake? LoooooLhow is that even possible?
The Following User Says Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:39
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#216
|
What? Rollin out software by mistake? LoooooLhow is that even possible?
The Following User Says Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:43
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 4,322 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#217
|
I don't think it's possible. I think peoples who "got new version just after using pkcon update" are just lying. If i'm wrong, then Jolla really did something really wrong
The Following User Says Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:56
|
|
Posts: 423 |
Thanked: 478 times |
Joined on Sep 2014
@ Netherlands
|
#218
|
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 17:59
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#219
|
![]() |
2015-04-13
, 18:34
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 1,832 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#220
|
We clearly need at least 2 levels of opt-in, the hardest core one should probably be via verification only.
Something roughly analogous to what vitaminj just outlined, I wish it was implemented by now, it should be piss-easy.