|
2010-04-03
, 12:12
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#222
|
Another thing that might be worth trying is to run 600MHz at OPP3 instead of OPP5. It might be out of spec, but Pandora people report that it is stable and it might save some battery if your processor spends a lot of time at this frequency.
|
2010-04-03
, 12:12
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
|
#223
|
|
2010-04-03
, 12:17
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sweden
|
#224
|
|
2010-04-03
, 13:27
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#225
|
|
2010-04-03
, 13:46
|
Posts: 256 |
Thanked: 98 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#226
|
|
2010-04-03
, 13:47
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#227
|
|
2010-04-03
, 13:52
|
|
Posts: 2,473 |
Thanked: 12,265 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Jerusalem, PS/IL
|
#228
|
|
2010-04-03
, 13:58
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#229
|
I'm actually more interested in what happens if you drop the maximum to 500 or 550 (and ideally reduce the voltage if possible). I get about 50% more battery life out of my laptop with a PentiumM processor using NHC to reduce its max to 1.4 GHz from 1.6 and reducing the voltage for all clock steps, and the difference in performance is negligible.
The Following User Says Thank You to Rushmore For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-03
, 14:07
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
|
#230
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fixfox For This Useful Post: | ||
|
I really want to try the 800mhz clock. And if it makes a little performance then you will get donation from me for sure.