![]() |
2017-07-29
, 08:44
|
|
Posts: 592 |
Thanked: 1,603 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Berlin / Germany
|
#2291
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to explit For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 08:01
|
Posts: 1,297 |
Thanked: 4,322 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#2292
|
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 10:11
|
Posts: 1,336 |
Thanked: 3,932 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Brittany, France
|
#2293
|
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 11:02
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2294
|
All patches in the Patchmanager 2.0 web catalog show as incompatible with 2.1.1.24, they all appear as updated for 2.1.1.23. Should I ignore the warning and install them anyway?
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 11:28
|
Posts: 1,336 |
Thanked: 3,932 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Brittany, France
|
#2295
|
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 11:41
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2296
|
Thanks, will do. But should these patches not display as 2.1.1.24-friendly? The updates show that most of them were published after the 2.1.1.24, and 2.1.1.23 OTA was up for only a very limited time anyway, so I guess the patches have actually been checked for 2.1.1.24, right?
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 11:48
|
Posts: 281 |
Thanked: 679 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#2297
|
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 11:58
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2298
|
![]() |
2017-07-31
, 18:20
|
|
Posts: 1,552 |
Thanked: 3,108 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
@ Russia, 96
|
#2299
|
![]() |
2017-08-01
, 05:27
|
Posts: 1,336 |
Thanked: 3,932 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Brittany, France
|
#2300
|
![]() |
Tags |
patchmanager, sailfish os |
|