Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 4 hrs, 45 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 17 hrs ago - more...
Vaddy |
2010-04-11
, 21:36
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Plymouth, Minnesota
|
#2371
|
Originally Posted by Ronaldo
okay I dropped the file in the n900 folder (F: drive), xterminal still says file doesn't exist, I have rootsh installed as well
 |
|
2010-04-11
, 21:38
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#2372
|
depends which file u dropped, if its 900 then make sure command includes 900 and not 800
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:40
|
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Switzerland
|
#2373
|
Originally Posted by titan
Would be a good idea, or 970 something like that, can you do it please?
good point. maybe we should try to replace 950 with 965?
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:40
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Plymouth, Minnesota
|
#2374
|
Originally Posted by Ronaldo
I did 800 because I'm not sure if my n900 can handle the 900mhz kernel so I downloaded the 800 fiasco file
depends which file u dropped, if its 900 then make sure command includes 900 and not 800
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:42
|
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#2375
|
Okay, I have done some extensive calculations and base voltage is 0.6v (VDD1 OFF) and each increment after that is equal to 0.0125V. So 0x1e equates to 0.975v
So for Lehto's kernel, running at 0x48 is actually changing the voltage of the CPU to 1.5V (max that the voltage rail can supply in this case it appears)
Also, a slight correction to my list previously
VDD1 OPP1 0.975v
VDD1 OPP2 1.050v (Though stock N900 kernel seems to be running it at 1.075V)
VDD1 OPP3 1.200v
VDD1 OPP4 1.270v
VDD1 OPP5 1.350v
So Titan's ideal kernel is currently running between 0.975V (500MHz) to 1.2V (850Mhz)
CORRECTION: Maximum voltage the power rail can supply is 1.8V so in theory, you can push it to 0x60 (I doubt that the power supply would withstand that...though 0x50 should be okay @90% efficiency)
Last edited by arbitrabbit; 2010-04-11 at 23:20.
So for Lehto's kernel, running at 0x48 is actually changing the voltage of the CPU to 1.5V (max that the voltage rail can supply in this case it appears)
Also, a slight correction to my list previously
VDD1 OPP1 0.975v
VDD1 OPP2 1.050v (Though stock N900 kernel seems to be running it at 1.075V)
VDD1 OPP3 1.200v
VDD1 OPP4 1.270v
VDD1 OPP5 1.350v
So Titan's ideal kernel is currently running between 0.975V (500MHz) to 1.2V (850Mhz)
CORRECTION: Maximum voltage the power rail can supply is 1.8V so in theory, you can push it to 0x60 (I doubt that the power supply would withstand that...though 0x50 should be okay @90% efficiency)
Last edited by arbitrabbit; 2010-04-11 at 23:20.
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:45
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2376
|
Originally Posted by titan
ok now 1.1 work
the last updates for tonight are uploaded: only ideal and normal kernel were updated.
DSP for >=850 was increased to 520MHz for the normal kernel.
the fmradio problem should be fixed.
1.1 and 1.15 GHz could now work (untested).
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:46
|
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#2377
|
because i am confused with all these kernels , i would likesomebody to answer me , some simples questions.
1.a 900mhz kernel is faster or the same with a 900mhz LV kernel?
2.The summer is approaching and the outside temprature in my country is usually from 28 to 32 celcious , which kernel will me most safe to use.
1.a 900mhz kernel is faster or the same with a 900mhz LV kernel?
2.The summer is approaching and the outside temprature in my country is usually from 28 to 32 celcious , which kernel will me most safe to use.
 |
|
2010-04-11
, 21:52
|
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#2378
|
Originally Posted by dimkit
1. Yes its the same. Just uses a lower voltage.
because i am confused with all these kernels , i would likesomebody to answer me , some simples questions.
1.a 900mhz kernel is faster or the same with a 900mhz LV kernel?
2.The summer is approaching and the outside temprature in my country is usually from 28 to 32 celcious , which kernel will me most safe to use.
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:55
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#2379
|
is there a stable 900mhz LV kernel?
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
|
|
2010-04-11
, 21:55
|
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ England
|
#2380
|
ok,
so here is my battery graph results after 7 days...
running 900mhz stock dsp. No over heating, no restarts/shutdowns, no stuttering, nothing unusual at all.
come to your own conclusions, some heavy use drains battery and some idle use it seems to go on and on and on and on....
day 1
day 2
day 3
day 4
day 5
day 6
day 7
so here is my battery graph results after 7 days...
running 900mhz stock dsp. No over heating, no restarts/shutdowns, no stuttering, nothing unusual at all.
come to your own conclusions, some heavy use drains battery and some idle use it seems to go on and on and on and on....
day 1
day 2
day 3
day 4
day 5
day 6
day 7
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:27.