The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-23
, 18:01
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#2392
|
So let's confirmation on the N9 touch technology. Someone said you can use fingernail on it. So is it both resistive and capacitive or not?
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-23
, 18:05
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#2393
|
is there are file manager/file browser on the N9 or the N950 ??
never saw it on preview or any video....can someone confirm this ??
|
2011-07-23
, 18:06
|
Posts: 20 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#2394
|
It may not be written in stone but it may be written in a legal document. The problem is that contract which is still being kept close to Nokias chest. This contract, I have always suspected has an exclusive OS agreement. This means that even if Meego sells well, Nokia, Elop, the board, or even the stockholders can't do anything about it. This exclusive OS agreement is as plain as day to me, Elops talk about "beating android our number one priority" may even suggest it's a performance based agreement. No sensible CEO would put all their eggs in one basket without an incentive. No sensible CEO would say no to the fastest selling OS because "they want to be different", no sensible CEO would scrap a handset being released to the general public soon because "it's OS is not ready or progressing quick enough" in favour of a handset who's release is even further behind. You need incentives for actions like this, to me this "future disruption" is the end of the exclusivity contract, the ability to move to your own OS again as a safety net if the contract didn't work in their favour or renewal falls through.
The Following User Says Thank You to Guest For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-23
, 18:19
|
Posts: 20 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#2395
|
|
2011-07-23
, 18:48
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2396
|
|
2011-07-24
, 01:00
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2398
|
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-24
, 01:13
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#2399
|
|
2011-07-24
, 02:51
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#2400
|
It may not be written in stone but it may be written in a legal document. The problem is that contract which is still being kept close to Nokias chest. This contract, I have always suspected has an exclusive OS agreement. This means that even if Meego sells well, Nokia, Elop, the board, or even the stockholders can't do anything about it. This exclusive OS agreement is as plain as day to me, Elops talk about "beating android our number one priority" may even suggest it's a performance based agreement. No sensible CEO would put all their eggs in one basket without an incentive. No sensible CEO would say no to the fastest selling OS because "they want to be different", no sensible CEO would scrap a handset being released to the general public soon because "it's OS is not ready or progressing quick enough" in favour of a handset who's release is even further behind. You need incentives for actions like this, to me this "future disruption" is the end of the exclusivity contract, the ability to move to your own OS again as a safety net if the contract didn't work in their favour or renewal falls through.
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|
IIRC there's no way WP was the fastest selling OS when the agreement was being fleshed-out (prolly Jan sometime?).
It's not even now is it? I've not seen any credible info. to support that, but happy to be convinced otherwise
Night all, wet dreams!
Last edited by jalyst; 2011-07-23 at 18:13.