Originally Posted by Bundyo

Twitter enforces a 5MB limit, so they might not be the originals.

Originally Posted by Breeze5

Do you have a model number. Seems like i don't find it

Originally Posted by nikos523

It's the sm-r800.
Maybe it doesn't look similar cause as I said, I'm using my chronograph's band and the rigke bezel.
The stock appearance is this
https://www.otto.de/p/samsung-galaxy...onId=736769768

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by netman

Personally I really like that picture of the dark window, no noise in the totally dark parts and still has plenty of detail wherever something is visible, I like it. The flower with the obviously fake bokeh... I dislike this type of effect, in any phone, but it's hip right now and implemented as good as any I've seen. The two cameras could help focus faster though which is cool, do not know if the software can do this.

Originally Posted by Maemish

I'm sick at the moment and fell asleep in the middle of writing. Somehow had though posted this unfinished. So deleted it and post this again
....
Time is the factory of conspiracy theories - time used on waiting.
....
Stay strong. Almost there. May the force be with you. Don't go to the dark side.

Edit: I could write this post because yesterday got a message that the books have been posted. Not anymore waiting them to be posted. Now waiting them to arrive. The time is slow for the one waiting. Slow train coming as Bob Dylan said.

Originally Posted by Fellfrosch

I hope there will be a possibility to shhot pictures in RAW format ...
I hate all these artificial photos. If I want to edit them, i want to do it on my own. Not a stupid automatic routine.

Originally Posted by Koiruus

I think having a good "auto" mode is not a bad thing. For example, I have a Pentax K5 DSLR, which is already quite old and the auto mode sucks. The sensor is pretty good and with decent optics it still performs quite well. But only if I shoot in RAW format and spend some time to do post-processing.

My girlfriend has some pretty modern smartphone with modern dual camera setup, and the phone is capable to shoot pretty nice photos in daylight at least. The auto mode recognizes people and faces and tries to light them properly, but also tries to adjust bright and dark areas to prevent burning etc. In many situations it performs surprisingly well. Of course it's not enough for a professional and even a non-professional recognizes the quality if you try, for example, to print the picture in poster size. But for casual, everyday use it is easily enough. Also the DSLR is something you don't want to carry around everywhere you go, but the phone is in your pocket almost always.

I love my Pentax but it's quite laborious to always transfer the photos to a pc (and not just any pc but your own pc which has Darktable installed), do the post-processing and convert to jpg/png before you are ready to publish or even show the photo for anyone. Having an easy option with instantly ready pictures is a good thing. But in more difficult situations, like low light, moving targets (fast shutter speeds, fast continuous shooting and short shutter lag), very cold conditions, multi-day adventures with no recharging abilities etc, is great to have a proper camera instead of a phone.